Beto O’Rourke strolls with his wife, Amy Hoover Sanders, and his three children, Ulysses, Henry and Molly in El Paso on 6 November 2018. Photograph: Paul Ratje/ AFP/ Getty Images
His involvement became problematic for two main reasons. The first was his family ties to the mastermind behind the plan, multi-millionaire real estate magnate William Sanders. Months after O’Rourke met members of the security council, he married Amy Sanders and William Sanders became his father-in-law.
The downtown project was a private-public partnership. The private slope involved a civic organization called the Paso del Norte Group, PDNG, which Sanders set up with some of his super-wealthy friends from El Paso.
Controversy erupted when it emerged that O’Rourke was also a member. Did his position, with one hoof in the private PDNG side of the treat and another on the public council side, amount to a conflict of interest? He was slapped with an moralities complaint, later dismissed.
O’Rourke initially voted in the council to go ahead with the change program, but as neighbourhood resist thrived he recused himself from several key referendums. Further cries of foul play pitched on him in 2012, when O’Rourke made an insurgent’s bid to depose the incumbent Congressman for El Paso, Silvestre Reyes.
A company owned by Sanders contributed $40,000 to a Republican-backedSuper Pac that invested in attack ads against Reyes, contributing to O’Rourke’s underdog victory and dedicating him a leg-up to Washington.
In a recent interrogation with the American Prospect, O’Rourke repudiated any conflict relating to his father-in-law. Sanders” manufactured it the standard rules that he religiously followed, never to talk politics”, he said.
But the Sanders connection still riles with activists opposed to the downtown scheme such as David Romo, a contributing is part of the main demonstration radical Paso del Sur. He said that O’Rourke’s connections to Sanders takes the shine off his current claim that as a presidential nominee he eschews big bucks and is running a ” people’s safarus “.
Romo told the Guardian that in his view O’Rourke’s role in the redevelopment shoots doubts concerning his 2020 candidacy.” What happened in El Paso is said that the solution to our national problems does not come from a multi-millionaire funded by billionaires who does their entreat .”
Romo is a celebrated historian of El Paso’s revolutionary past and as such is an articulate exponent of the second criticism leveled at O’Rourke over the redevelopment strategy- that he surfaced with gentrification despite the impairment it would foist on poor Latino residents and historic El Paso.” He was the jolly face of ugly gentrification .”
O’Rourke is denying that he surfaced with gentrifiers, holding his intention was to breathe new life into the dilapidated middle of a major metropoli. He did tell the American Prospect, though, that in hindsight he accepts that he did” a really poor chore of listening to that criticism “.
‘He truly does need to answer questions’
Similar controversy followed O’Rourke to Washington. Whether it originated from his innate pragmatism as a politician who tends to decide each topic as it comes rather than following ideology, or whether it was because of his beginnings in Texas, a state that has been dominated by Republicans for the past 20 times, his voting record in Congress was impressing for its lack of party purity.
Although El Paso turns overwhelmingly Democratic, a fivethirtyeight.com tracker shows that he voted 30% of the time in accordance with Trump. Compare that to his presidential contenders: Kamala Harris( 17% ), Bernie Sanders( 14%) or Elizabeth Warren( 13% ).
That didn’t matter much in his senatorial hasten last-place November. But then he was running against Ted Cruz, one of the most toxic rightwing senators who even fellow Republicans call ” Lucifer in the flesh “.
In that hasten he proved himself to have various of the qualities that might appeal to Democratic voters looking for a presidential campaigner capable of beating Trump, first and foremost his ability to turn out the vote. He indicated himself adept in charm to young person, African Americans, Latinos and suburban white girls- electoral groups all likely to play a crucial role in 2020 in deciding Trump’s fate.
But the road to the presidential nomination is proving to be a stonier path for O’Rourke than his itinerary last year. By taking his safarus national he has moved on to much more fertile ground for a Democrat than the traditionally arid grunge of Texas, yet it has come at the price of aggressively intensified scrutiny.
Which delivers O’Rourke back to his climate change announcement amid the splendor of Yosemite Falls. Fossil fuel activists may only be agreeably surprised by O’Rourke’s robust program, but that doesn’t mean they have forgotten that its liaison with the oil industry has been complicated.
He hesitated for weeks before agreeing to sign the No Fossil Fuel Money Pledge in which candidates forego all subscriptions above $200 from Pacs, lobbyists and executives of fossil fuel business. The assurance was particularly sensitive for O’Rourke, who according to Open Secrets abode more contributions from oil and gas in 2018 than any congressional candidate other than Ted Cruz.
He has said his hesitancy was out of concern for ordinary workers in service industries who should be allowed to participate. The organizers of the assurance however stressed that only the donations of top honchoes were excluded.
In the end, he did sign the assurance, two days after his Yosemite declaration.
Another sticking point is that O’Rourke voted twice in Congress to filch a 40 -year ban on US exports of crude oil. He tried to justify the voting rights in October 2015, two months before the Paris Agreement on combating climate change was adopted by 195 nations, by arguing that US crude was cleaner than that of other nations and” the oil that supplyings the current dominant mode of transportation will have to come from somewhere “.
The lifting of the ban has led to a massive spike in US crude exports, from well under 1m barrels a day to more than 3m per period currently.” There’s been a hazardous and problematic increase in the extraction of crude oil driven by exportations in the US. He truly does need to answer questions about that poll ,” David Turnbull of Oil Change US said.
It all points to the steep uphill climb that Beto O’Rourke faces if he is to claw his acces back into the Democratic spotlight. The Yosemite announcement made a solid start, introducing American voters to a more serious, focused politician than they had previously been shown.
Now the real scramble begins.