The phrase “car accident” is exploited nearly reflexively, both in conversational and media context. It just seems distasteful: its dictionary definition is “an event that is not planned or intended.” And no one intends to disintegrate their car.

But we do make choices that lead to vehicle coincidences.

In the 1960 s, William Haddon, the first administrator of the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, used to make anyone who employed the word “accident” in a meeting pay a ten-cent fine. The “-Aword, ” he concluded, allowed beings to take too little responsibility for the decisions that lead to driving injuries.

That’s why the New York City nonprofits Transportation Alternatives and Houses for Safe Streets have rallied around the catchphrase “crash , not accident.” Through a hashtag, pledge, and incidents like a 2015 vigil in Union Square, they hope to change the culture of responsibility around commerce savagery. And they make a altered in conversation could help prevent at least some of the 1. 3 million congestion fatalities that happen each year.

“An ‘accident’ seems equivalent to that given to spilling milk, or an deed of God, ” says Caroline Samponaro of Transportation Alternatives. “That’s not what a vehicle disintegrate is. There’s ever a human option behind any crash.”

According to the campaign website, the word “accident” grew widely used during the Industrial Revolution, when mill proprietors wanted to absolve themselves of creating unsafe work conditions. And Vox excused that early automobile hallways in the 1920 s pushed newspapers to use the period coincidence to influence news coverage of crashes.

“Accident is the transportation equivalent of -_() _ /-, ” as a Gizmodo essay introduces it.

Since news reports are such a big part of automobile crashes in the public consciousness, awareness-raising campaigns specifically targets the media.

“I want reporters to use words accurately, ” says Massachusetts Director of Highway Safety Jeff Larason, who is a big supporter of awareness-raising campaigns. “Reporters commonwealth facts and are often so careful with their messages. Why do they perpetuate the crash/ accident error? “

The campaign counts as a important milestone the AP Style Book’s recommendation, in April 2016, to recommend the word “crash” when “negligence is claimed or proven.”

The media is a powerful force in different cultures around vehicle crash responsibility, says Amy Cohen of Families for Safe Streets, because too many beings ignore the questions until it changes them personally.

Cohen’s 12 -year-old son died in a automobile crash related to speeding in 2013.

“When you examine the word ‘accident’ in an clause, ” she told HuffPost, “it indicates a decision by the reporter to presume innocence from the get-go. And that’s often not the case.”

The statistics seem to back her up on that. The leading campaigns of automobile accidents in America are 😛 TAGEND Distracted driving( like texting or eating at the rotation) Speeding Drunk driving


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here