First it was taboo , now its banal: how the Divorce Reform Act has influenced family life over the past 50 years

I‘ll never forget the day my mothers told me that they were getting divorced. It was the late 90 s, I was 11, and I had returned from school clutching an lubricant pastel transcript of Picasso’s Woman In A Hat( Olga ), 1935, which I had obligated in prowes class for reasons now lost to the clouds of hour. I was evoked to show it to them. Instead, they told me I should sit down, and that their matrimony was resolving. It didn’t seem appropriate to show off my visualize after that.

Seven years later, I witnessed the decorate in real life at the Centre Pompidou in Paris, learning, in a twist of synchronicity, that Picasso had painted this sad, unflattering photograph of his first bride shortly after their marriage had collapsed. Olga left Picasso, and my mother left my father, though it was Dad who moved out of the family home. It ended my heart.

It’s now 50 times since the Divorce Reform Act 1969 was drafted. The legislation meant that, for the first time, couples could divorce without one inevitably having to prove the mistake of the other( they still needed evidence of adultery, unjust behaviour, desertion, or segregation for two years- or five years if one party did not consent to the divorce ). It liberalised the process, establishing divorce available to ordinary duets, and dedicating them the option of a less adversarial legal process.

The legislation altered society, changed postures, liberated wives, and arguably saved many children from the psychological impairment of being raised in squalid homes. Harmonizing to the latest figures from the Office for National Statistics, an estimated 42% of all wedlocks in England and Wales currently expiration in divorce; and in 2017, 62% of divorces of opposite sexuality duos were on the petition of the wife.

Divorce is now so common that its impact on children and their psychological wellbeing can sometimes be minimise. Yet almost every child of divorce I have spoken to acknowledges that it has determined the road they view the nations of the world. It feels nearly foolish be talking about the psychological bequest of my own parents’ divorce, how it left its symbol on me in a hundred noticeable and imperceptible styles; after all, it was so many years ago. Yet nonetheless well you do it, divorce specifies who we become as adults.

I set out to meet people whose parents divorced in each decade following the 1969 routine, to try to understand more about how it has affected their lives. How has it shaped their outlooks to relationships and marriage? And do they wish their parents had done anything differently?


By the time my parents divorced, in 2001, nearly all my institution friends were living in single-parent households, so I didn’t feel odd. Chris Marsh, however, was the only child of divorce in his Church of England school in 1972. The 1970 s might now be associated with sexual liberation, but at the start of the decade Britain remained a conservative culture where divorce was stigmatised and uncommon. In 1971, 74,437 pairs divorced in England and Wales. By 1979, the number of members of divorces had almost redoubled, to 138,706.

Marsh is 57, and when we meet in a coffeehouse near his London home, he tells me that, following a nervous breakdown five years ago, he is now incapacitated and unable to work.” I have some periods where I can’t leave the house ,” he says. A tall, soothing humanity with manner sees, he talks rapidly in a cockney accent not unlike Michael Caine’s.

Marsh was 11 when his parents divorced in 1972. His father was Richard Marsh, then an MP and later chairman of British Rail.” The divorce was splashed across the front pages of the neighbourhood newspapers and reported extensively in the national press ,” he says. His father had left his mother for a BBC researcher. One era he arrived in the school playground and everyone knew.” A group of kids smothered me, like I’m a human maypole. Dancing around it going:’ Your daddy’s left your mummy .'” He repeats the scoff in the singsong singer beloved of academy bullies everywhere.” I was devastated ,” Marsh says.” I can remember their singers clearly. It was “the worlds largest” harrowing suffer I’ve had .” Sent home from school, he sat in a park, and never mentioned the bullying to his already distraught baby.” I learned then that this had separated social taboos- that this was something bad .”

Marsh says the experience has left him with an intense fear of being adjudicated, which has affected his whole life, including the way he dealt with his sexuality.” I’d already have known that you don’t interrupt social inhibitions ,” he says.” I wanted to conform. I didn’t come out until I was 32.” Marsh has had one long-term relationship, but says he knows gay wedding at odds with the idea of lesbian freeing. “[ Divorce] educated me that good-for-nothing lasts for ever .”

He is scathing about the direction cultural outlooks at the time were influenced by the church.” I’m not just an atheist- I imagine religion is dangerous. It sets lessons that people can’t lives up to ,” he says. His early trauma was further compounded by others: his father’s second bride, Caroline Dutton, died in a automobile disintegrate in 1975, followed by his mother. His father envisaged suicide. There was so much unexpressed anguish. But there was no counselling in the 1970 s, he reminds me; to “his fathers”, that would have been weakness. They never actually spoke about the divorce.

What, I asked about, would you say to a child whose mothers are getting divorced today?” Talk to beings. There’s nothing incorrect with feeling baffled, upset and indignant .” I reflect that I should probably have had counselling, too, but at least I was able to have open a discussion with my mothers.” We lost our families ,” Marsh says.” When you’re young, its important linchpin you’ve got is your family .”


Rachael Stevenson describes her childhood as idyllic; but when her mothers separated, she was abruptly taken out of boarding school. Photograph: Fabio De Paola/ The Guardian

Rachael Stevenson’s mothers divorced over a decade later, in 1987, when she was 11. The 1980 s was the decade that produced the most futile weddings: of the 344,334 couples who tied the bow in 1983, 43% subsequently divorced, a higher rate than today. There was republican panic about” clas significances”, with Margaret Thatcher telling her private secretary:” Children need security and must be brought up in a stable, affection environment in which parents offer time, affection and steering. These things are most likely when the parents are married- and bide married .”

Stevenson is 44 now, and lives in Manchester with her second spouse. They have five children- three from Stevenson’s first union, one from her husband’s first marriage, and one together. Stevenson describes her childhood as idyllic; but when her parents separated, she was abruptly taken out of boarding school, and her nature shifted.” Abruptly we were up until midnight dealing with distressing status ,” she says.

Stevenson, her brother and their leader stood with relatives and in temporary accommodation( her sister remained at school ). Her mother, meanwhile, moved in with her new collaborator and became pregnant shortly afterwards.” We didn’t have attorney. We didn’t have anybody request us how we were ,” Stevenson says.” We stopped speaking about my mum at home. When we had the brand-new house we had no pictures of her up- we didn’t really say the word ‘mum’ at all. It was like we hadn’t had the living standards we’d had.

” The thing that was large-scale to me was that parties would assume you had a mum, and I didn’t ,” she continues. Once, a educator set her on the spot in cookery class by asking her why she hadn’t bring any parts.” I precisely intent up saying,’ My mum has left, and we are living in a bed and breakfast in Southport .’ That shut her up .”

Rachael Stevenson and her brother and sister stayed with their father( all visualized) when her parents separate in 1987. She was 11. Photograph: courtesy of Rachael Stevenson

Stevenson says the divorce changed her approach to relationships.” In my early teenages I became hopeless for love and associate, which I frequently correct for copulation ,” she says. She became pregnant when she was just 18, by a US serviceman, and they married shortly afterwards. She didn’t take up her university situate and went on to have three children with him, divorcing at 29.” I was very insecure about whether or not he cherished me, or if he was interested in other people. I was very jealous and had a lot of climate swings, which I didn’t realise at the time weren’t ordinary .”

When she divorced her first husband, Stevenson was careful not to speak ill of him in front of the children. She assembled her second partner through Reverse Rett, the charity she lay out for research into Rett Syndrome, a severe disability that affects both their daughters. She has been working on her anxiety about self-esteem and forsaking in therapy.

She says her mothers’ abrupt divorce has determined her own parenting form.” I am absolutely hopeless for them never to feel vacated. I can’t stand the thought of being late to pick them up from institution ,” she says.” Having my child or children drew me be understood that parents are just people who have babes. They don’t get everything right. My mum cherished us, even though things panned out the space they did .” She adds that her parent” has always been there for us “.

” When “youre gonna” splitting up with person, your attitude towards them shapes who you are and who their own children become ,” Stevenson says. Things were hard for her father-god, she says, trying to bring up three cracked children around his own, but he never spoke mischievously of their father.” I do feel as if there’s a act of limitations for accusing your mothers. But divorce changes your life, your outlook, your ability to desire and be in relationships .”


Emma Cottle was six when her mothers divorced in 1995. Photograph: Fabio De Paola/ The Guardian

Emma Cottle, 30, from Exeter, was six when her mothers divorced, in 1995. She and her brother were part of a detention battle that been instrumental in her splitting her era between her mom and father’s homes: “[ I had] Mondays, Tuesdays and Thursdays with my mum, Wednesdays with my pa and then we alternated weekends. I wanted to spend more time with my daddy, so I asked to have Thursdays with him, extremely .” It helped that Cottle’s mothers lived in the same village.” They were both mindful of not creating a big drama, and they missed me and my brother to feel safe and secure ,” she says.

Cottle didn’t learn the reasons for the breakdown of the wedding until she was 17. Her eventual heart-to-heart with her father was, she says, “cathartic”. ” Up to that object I’d never spoken to him about it. I hadn’t wanted to open up old-time weaves .” Cottle, who is single, is theoretical about the divorce.” The thought of my mothers being together and sorry is heartbreaking ,” she says.” They’ve been so much happier apart, simply living their own lives, and I think it has- maybe too much- learn me how to be independent. I don’t look to find meaning in a partner .”

Emma Cottle with her parents and brother in 1992. Photograph: courtesy of Emma Cottle

Her mothers remained civil, attending Cottle’s graduation ceremony together. Last summer, her mom died of cancer, and she says it was a great comfort that her father was a huge assistance.” He has been amazing. When she arrived at the hospice, he pedaled her around the garden-varieties to see the flowers, and acquired sure she was settled in. After that, she was too poorly to go outside, so I will always be grateful to him for that .”

He sounds like a very emotionally intelligent man, I say, and she agrees. This seems a significant culture transformation. As the decades since the divorce play have legislated, we have become more comfortable discussing our feelings; more open to families in all their incarnations.


In the mid-1 990 s, the Family Law Bill proposed the removal of all remnants of matrimonial mistake from legislation in England and Wales, but became mired in dispute. Baroness Young argued that” by removing[ fault ], the state is actively discouraging any theory of lifelong commitment in matrimony, to standards of behaviour, to self-sacrifice, to any envisage for members of the family “. In the end, this portion of the bill was never ordained. Had it been, I have no doubt that many people’s divorces would have been far less conflict-ridden.

By the start of the new millennium, offsprings were considered beings in their own right, whose wishes and needs began to take on more importance. Attitudes to relationships were liberalising, and sociologists are of the view that divorce reasons relatively small juveniles abiding questions. Other influences, such as poor parental mental health, financial rigour, reiterated disturbance and high levels of conflict during break were recognised as having a more significant impact on a child’s wellbeing.

Bethan Tolley, 25, from the West Midlands, was eight when her parents divorced in 2002.” I’ve got to give it to them- they painted the picture really well ,” she says of the moment she learned they were splitting up.” They said,’ You’re going to have two Christmases, you’re going to have two birthdays .’ I loved the relevant recommendations of having two bedrooms .”

Tolley’s parents bided on good terms. When her father started dating ladies, eventually marrying her stepmum, dealing with here the homophobia was more difficult than anything to do with the divorce. Her father has remarried, extremely, meaning that Tolley now has two stepmums. Both placeds of grandparents were also a big presence in her childhood.

Having so many supportive adults around must have helped, I say.” Life is more full because of all the people in it ,” Tolley agrees. Being a child of divorce hasn’t placed her off wedlock, and she is now committed.” If anything, my mothers’ divorce prepared me even more serious about union ,” she says.” This is the structure and the stability I have always missed. I cherish the idea of that person you expend the rest of your life with, and having a family .” Though she hopes she would never divorce, she is glad the option is there.” There is no sense waste each other’s lives and season ,” she says.” I think sometimes the reasoning can have a much worse impact than exactly piercing the bullet and moving on .”


Maz Halima:’ I haven’t seen a health form of union, so I’m not in a rush to do it .’ Photograph: Fabio De Paola/ The Guardian

Maz Halima is a 30 -year-old writer and kindnes employee from Croydon. When her mothers divorced, in 2002, she was 14 and so relieved. Halima remembers the environment at home was toxic, with lots of arguings. Her mother came to the UK from Pakistan as a young child, and her father when he was 27. They had been divorced from one another once before, in the 1980 s, before Halima was born. It was, she says, a” can’t live with each other, can’t live without each other” tie-in, and when it aimed her mother participated a downward spiraling that included alcohol abuse.

The divorce, Halima says, has affected her approach to relationships.” I’ve regrettably become those individuals who feels more deserving in a relationship that has drama, because I insure drama as meaning that the other person attentions .” She came close to marriage formerly, before discontinuing the relations.” I haven’t seen a healthy form of matrimony, so I’m not in a rush to go and do it. I’m scared of owned. I likewise want to do what I miss, when I miss, and I think it’s hard to find someone who is OK with that .”

Halima with her father, father-god and older sister in 1992. Photograph: courtesy of Maz Halima

Choosing her texts carefully, she says that the room in which marriage can be perceived within Pakistani culture, and the method her father responded to her baby aiming the relations, has shaped her feminist politics.” You’ buy’ a woman in a sense. So the facts of the case that they got divorced and my mum said, I’m done- I think that was kind of outrageous to him .”

Despite this, their relationship improved after they separated.” The whole of their union, they were never friends. They were only friends when they are “re divorced” ,” she says.” When my dad’s been malady, my mum’s cooked for him, she’s cleaned his home. I’ll got to go and she’ll merely be there having a cup of tea. But then they bickered last week .” She smiles as if to say: that’s the way it travels.” I am trying to unlearn it, but I romanticise the insecurity I knowledge. Your parents are the first lesson of ardour that you’re shown .”


Matthew Betts was in his 20 s when his parents split, in 2013. Photograph: Fabio De Paola/ The Guardian

As we towards the end of the 2010 s, there has been significant progress in attitudes towards divorce. Gay marriage has been legalised, and mixed , non-traditional kinfolks are increasingly the norm. Even Prince Harry married a divorcee. In April, the government announced fresh plans to introduce no-fault divorce– though it is hard to know if and when this will happen. The reforms will include a minimum timeframe of six months from application stagecoach to a matrimony being culminated, designed to enable couples to reflect on their decision. They will too prevent people from refusing a divorce if their marriage miss one.

Matthew Betts’ mothers divorced in 2013. He is now 30, and grew up in Derby. He is disarmingly open about his family background, but his narrative demonstrates that progress doesn’t ever keep moving a straight line. Betts’ mother didn’t tell him, or other family and friends, until three months after the wedding intention. Before that, his father would come home and give the impression he was living in the marital residence whenever their sons were calling. Until his mother broke down and told him what had happened, he had never seen her cry.” My mum was a bearer of stigma. She thought it was a failure. She was concerned about us having a fractured dwelling. It was because she made a vow, for better or worse … while my dad had reached the point where it was unsound .”

Betts describes his upbringing as” utterly heteronormative- a mum who was a cook and a clean, and a dad who was the worker. I felt a significant amount of regret that they abode together for the sake of me and my brothers, and the outmoded notion of a’ traditional dwelling ‘.”

Matthew Betts with his mother. Photograph: courtesy of Matthew Betts

After deciding to retrain as a medical doctor, Betts moved back in with his mother, and was there while she was treated for hollow. He too became closer to his two brothers.” It was like the skies cleared after a tempest ,” he says.

Divorce can do that, I remember, spurring conferences that would otherwise have been crushed. You cry in front of each other. People shout. You come to see your mothers as flawed humans, rather than authority illustrations. If you’re lucky, a distance can sometimes be breached.

Betts says he went through a period where he was anti-monogamy, but is now in a relationship.” It works for many, many parties – you’ve just got to communicate ,” he says. I expect Betts if he guesses parties of our generation will handle divorce better. He frames his response like the doctor he is training to be:” I can’t wait to see what the epidemiology is in 20 times’ era, when it’s us who are negotiating these things. I certainly hope so .”

That day when I came home clutching my Picasso varied everything. But I recognise now that my mothers’ long-term wellbeing, and therefore my own, was dependent on their wedlock not continuing. What it all comes down to, ultimately, is conversation- the acces we explain to a child what is happening, or the acces we describe a partner in front of them. It’s about observing the words, but also knowing when to say nothing. In trying to make sense of the bow of complex feelings we have around divorce, we’re all still learning the language.

It’s the end of the world as they know it: how to help children cope with divorce

* ” Don’t bad-mouth each other and don’t try to draw “their childrens” take line-ups, or even worse, alienate small children from a mother. This mode, the likelihood of a child being permanently traumatised is considerably lessened ,” says psychotherapist Philippa Perry.

* Children want to be told what is happening- involve them as much as you can. Some want to be involved in decisions about where they will live. Harmonizing to experiment from the Department for Children, Schools and Families, how well they cope depends on the timing and pace of change, and the fullest extent to which they are prepared.

* Recognise that a child’s happiness isn’t is dependant on a nuclear family structure:” The designs can be as conventional or unconventional as you like. Parents can live apart, or together, in a commune or a menage a trois, they can be gay, straight or bisexual- it doesn’t matter ,” says Perry in her bestseller, The Book You Wish Your Parents Had Read. It is the way the family functions that is more relevant.

* There are a range of services dedicated to assisting parents and children during and after divorce. Counselling may help. Contact your GP, Relate or the Association of Child Psychotherapists.

* If you would like a comment on this article to be considered for inclusion on Weekend magazine’s letters page in photograph, delight email weekend @theguardian. com, including your name and address( not for pamphlet ).


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here