The great heavyweight endorse stood up to white America. But the presidents interest in the case isnt due to civil rights

A few weeks ago, Sylvester Stallone called Donald Trump with specific suggestions: why not grant a posthumous pardon to Jack Johnson, the first black heavyweight champion? Given the left-field nature of the idea, there’s a good chance the president may actually go through with it.

Johnson reigned from 1908 -1 915, though in the opinion of numerous boxing experts, he was the best heavyweight in the world for a much longer period. And as documentarian Ken Burns says in his 2004 movie, Unforgivable Blackness:” For more than 13 years, Jack Johnson was the most famous and the most notorious African American on Earth .”

Johnson was born in 1878- or some time around then, there are no surviving records- and grew up in Galveston, Texas, a city, for the time and place at least, loosened on racial questions. He playing with white boys, unaware of the restrictions he would face in the outside world as he proliferated older. It’s a testament to his forte of will that when he was confronted by those boundaries in later life, he simply discounted them.

When Johnson became rich enough to afford vehicles, he raced them down public streets, and when stopped by white policemen, whipped out some legislations from his wallet and told them to “keep the change.” According to a narration which has never been verified, Henry Ford contributed Johnson a brand-new gondola every year, assuming that when he was pulled over for quicken, a photo of a grinning Johnson beside his glossy brand-new Ford would appear in newspapers in all regions of the country.

It was the same story in the ring. He lampooned and razzed his white adversaries, derided his black challengers, stimulated his own deals without white managers, flaunted his success in public, and, most shocking of all to both blacks and whites, romanced and married grey ladies, abusing at least one of them.

Though Johnson was undeniably bright in the ring, he was far from the Colin Kaepernick or Muhammad Ali of his epoch. When he stood up to white America- something that took huge personal courage- it was to help himself rather than African Americans as a whole. He showed no show solidarity with other blacknes Americans and even took anguishes to distance himself from their spokesmen. As Paul Beston writes in his superb history of the American heavyweight division, The Boxing Kings, “[ WEB] DuBois and[ Booker T] Washington is accepted that a pitch-black serviceman in the public eye had broader responsibilities to the race. Johnson didn’t think so.’ I have found no better way of forestalling racial prejudice ,’ he wrote,’ than to act in my relations with people of other races as if prejudice did not exist .’ Individualism was his creed .” Simply introduced, Johnson lived a philosophy as free from identity politics as a Fox News commentator.

His victories made pride to millions of African Americans but the victories over lily-white fighters too sparked race riots in which perhaps hundreds of men and women were injured and more than a few died( at least 20 reported killed after his 1910 fight with the beloved former champ Jim Jefferies ). But Johnson took no soreness to soothe the perturbed oceans “hes had” stirred.

In the 2004 account, Unforgivable Blackness( a friend part to the Ken Burns documentary ), Geoffrey Ward attacked the narrative of Johnson as a role model for black activists.” He never seems to have been interested in collective activity of any kind. How could he be when he saw himself ever as a unique mortal apart from everyone else ?”

Despite his suffering at the handwritings of a prejudiced boxing foundation, Johnson did little to help other blacknes soldiers. He discounted challenges from the other enormous black heavyweights of his era, particularly the three men who many regarded as the uncrowned champion, Sam Langford( the pair had fought before Johnson won the heavyweight designation, with the much larger Johnson said to have won readily ). Instead, he campaigned well-known white boxers. Johnson was a far superior soldier than the vast majority of white boxers he regularly overpower, even when adjudicators and audiences were against him. That riled white America, which was determined to take him down. In 1913, the bigots succeeded. After relentless investigations into his relationships with white wives, Johnson was convicted( by an all-white jury) of flouting the Mann Act, moving a prostitute across territory rows in a decidedly shaky occasion.

As Jesse Washington wrote on The Undefeated:” The first color heavyweight champion was wrongfully imprisoned a century ago by racist experts who is currently scandalized by his destruction of white boxers and his relationships with white women .” Johnson swiftly fled to Europe where, he said, he would be treated” like a human being “. He returned to the US in 1920 and provided 10 months of his one-year sentence.

Jack Johnson’s wedlock to a white woman, Etta Duryea, outraged much of America. Photograph: Ullstein Bild/ ullstein bild via Getty Images

In 1927 Johnson produced a memoir, In The Ring and Out, which was surprisingly well received. With the book, Johnson, in effect, reproduced his own lore. In 1946 he was driving to New York to watch a Joe Louis fight- Johnson, resentful of the second black man to acquire the heavyweight title, mocked Louis’s abilities and experienced baiting him from ringside. Johnson disintegrated his Ford into a light-footed spar near Raleigh, North Carolina- after apparently leaving a dinerthat refused to serve him because of his hasten- and was declared dead at 68.

That was the end of an amazing life, but not of the Johnson legend. Twenty years after his death, in an era of burgeoning black consciousness, Johnson was promoted as the kind of hero he never aspired to in life. In 1967, Howard Sackler’s play, The Great White Hope , drawn its debut. It starred a perfectly shed James Earl Jones as Jack Jefferson, a barely disguised sketch of Johnson, and in 1970 the romp was adapted into a much admired cinema. A years later, the coolest humankind on the planet, Miles Davis, released Jack Johnson( later reissued as A Tribute to Jack Johnson) as the soundtrack for a documentary.

Unless, that is, the coolest husband on the planet was Muhammad Ali. Ali sometimes sounded as if he thought he was the reincarnation of the first color champ:” I am Jack Johnson !” he was fond of saying. But Ali was far more than that. He was persecuted for his association with the Nation of Islam- then known as the Black Muslims- and for his political judgments, specially his refusal to be inducted into the armed forces during the course of its Vietnam War on moral fields. Johnson wouldn’t have come within a mile of the Black Muslims. And if the US government had tried to draft him during a struggle, he’d have left the country rather than face the consequences.

Over the years many legislators have floated the relevant recommendations of posthumously excusing Johnson, most recently Senator John McCain. Johnson did get a bum rap on the Mann Act, but the Jack Johnson whose label Republicans want to “save” is the Johnson attribute of The Great White Hope, the man anointed by Davis and Ali.

And why a pardon for Johnson now? Perhaps wisely, Barack Obama took a second pass in 2015( the first was in 2009) when Congress approved a invoice which included a resolution to pardon Johnson. As Jesse Washington memorandum,” Exonerating Johnson would have opened Obama up to ethnic repercussions unique to the first pitch-black president … Obama was focused on clemency for living victims of mass incarceration policies, which disproportionately feign the pitch-black parish .” If Obama had pardoned Johnson, you can bet Fox News would have recreated the real Johnson and screamed blood murder.

So why has Trump decided to be Johnson’s savior? There is perhaps a feeling that Trump would use a pardon to score objects over Obama. Washington feels that” a excuse would furnish Trump with an opportunity to do something, albeit symbolic, about ethnic inequality. Trump’s Justice Department is recreating the’ tough on crime’ public policies that developed the racially biased cataclysm of mass captivity- the exact calamity that Obama tried to mitigate with both policy and his huge number of commuted sentences .”

So should Johnson be reprieved? After all, the Mann Act rap on Johnson never had much credence. Gerald Early, chairman of Black American Studies at Washington University in St Louis and editor of, among other journals, The Muhammad Ali Reader, says:” I think it is fine to reprieve Johnson. It was undoubtedly a racially motivated prosecution that was done under a very poorly saw piece of legislation. But there were other questionable or debatable prosecutions under the act that should be looked into as well, Chuck Berry’s for instance. In as much the law is an example of federal overreach and has clearly not done well what it was purported to be trying to do- namely, protect women against being prostituted- probably many who were imprisoned under the act should be reprieved .”

When Louis lost his first fight with Schmeling in 1936 in New York, African American men openly wept on the streets of Harlem; some suffered heart attack listening to the fight on the radio. The African American singer Lena Horne, performing at a fraternity that night, broke down when she discover the word. Her mother reproached her,” You don’t even know the man .” Horne replied that she didn’t have to know him:” He is subject to all of us .”

And so Louis does, then and now. Much more so than Johnson, who never certainly belonged to anyone but himself. Maybe, in Johnson, Donald Trump accompanies a kindred spirit.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here