22.8 C
Rome
Friday, September 20, 2019
Home Blog Page 357

Microsoft’s Project Springfield helps developers find and squash faults

0

Microsoft today announced a first preview ofProject Springfield at its Ignite conference in Atlanta. The cloud-based implement aims to help developers find faults in their implementation by blending fuzz measuring, an automated behavior of testing system by hurling semi-random input at it, with neural networks tools that allow thetool to ask smarter what-if queries when it looks at potential security issues.

Think of a gondola disintegrate, Microsoft researcher David Molnar told me. If you only identify research results, you dont know why the accident happened. A regular fuzzer may tell you when the system clangs, but the AI aspect of appropriate tools allows it to reason about how the software actually labours. The squad repeatedly memo how it looks at this instrument as the best practice to find$ 1 million faults, that is, potential security issues inits own operating systems and productivity implements that could incur significant costs to fix once they have been deployed.

Each occasion it runs, it amasses data to hone in on the areas that are most critical, the team writes in todays edict. This more focused, intelligent approaching prepares it most likely that Project Springfield will find vulnerabilities other fuzzing implements might miss.

Developers upload their binaries to the service and all of the actual testing is happening at the gloom. Formerly appropriate tools has identified a flaw, itll give the developer access to test cases to help procreate the issue.

Internally, Microsoft has been using a similar implement for about 10 years now, Molnar told me. Its been using it to see potential imperfections in Windows, for example.

One fascinating position here is that the tool doesnt are in need of the source system. Instead, it uses the final binary, which makes a company could use it to evaluate system it buys from outside sourcesor when it acquires another busines, too.

Using this compounding of multiple different fuzzing proficiencies and AI, the team disagrees, allows it to find more flaws and deeper bugs than other experimenting methodologies.

The ultimate goal here, Molnar replied, is to democratize this technologyby making it so easy to plug into the increase pipe that each company can use it.Hewouldnt say when Microsoft plans to ship Project Springfield to developers, but he repeatedly noted that you are able to sign up for the preview.

Buying Whole Foods could be Amazon’s Waterloo

0

(CNN)When Jeff Bezos made his now-mythical car journey across the country to Seattle, he dreamed up the idea of an online store that could sell everything. The founder and chief executive of Amazon started with books, then moved into other products.

Now you can buy anything from a mullet hairstyle wig to Madagascar hissing cockroaches on Amazon. The company controls 43% of online retail sales in the United States.
The one sector of the retail market Amazon does not have a significant toe-hold in is the gigantic $800 billion a year grocery market. That is until now. With the deal to buy Whole Foods, the online retailer now has a small slice of the grocery market (about 1.2%), which is dominated by a handful of firms like Walmart (14.2%) and Kroger (7.2%).
    Clearly the large players are worried. The shares of the biggest supermarket chains fell by about 6% when the deal was announced.
    So far, the deal has been great for Amazon. Usually acquisitions lose money for big companies. But Amazon immediately gained over $14 billion on its market capitalization when the deal was announced — that is more than the $13.6 billion the Seattle based company plans to pay for Whole Foods.

      Why Amazon is buying Whole Foods

    But the deal may not be so wonderful in the long term. Amazon’s introduction into the grocery business is likely to ratchet up competition in the grocery sector. This might have some impact on already dominant players like Walmart, but it is likely to hit small players particularly hard, driving many smaller grocery firms out of business. This will inevitably also have an effect on the already dead or dying American main street.
    The deal will also effect employees at Whole Foods. Currently, the company offers employees ample opportunities to “be themselves” at work. Amazon, in contrast, is famed for its high-pressure corporate culture, which requires unrelenting performance. It is likely Whole Foods employees will find their new “Amabot” overlords difficult to swallow (Amabot is the nickname Amazon employees give themselves).
    We might expect that consumers would benefit out of this deal. For instance the 80 million Amazon Prime subscribers might find it very convenient to order food as well as films. However, having one company that potentially provides everything for you means that that company is likely to know more about you than your husband or wife.
    Amazon is likely to touch all aspects of your life — being there from when you wake up to when you hit the pillow at night. Alexa may even listen over you while you sleep — just in case you want to place an order in the early hours.

      See Jeff Bezos test the giant robot of your nightmares

    The increasing dominance of Amazon also poses potential risks for the nation as a whole. Amazon’s vision is that a large percentage of a country’s population will become dependent on the company to supply it with everything it needs to live. This opens up a serious risk that if something goes wrong with that company — say a large-scale software failure — a huge number of people would have to go without basic items like food or toilet paper.
    Within days this could spiral into a national emergency.
    Finally, the decision to extend into the food sector might seem great for the company’s investors. But there are significant risks. Large corporations often find it difficult, if not impossible, to change businesses.
    We have to keep in mind that what Amazon is trying to do with the Whole Foods detail is to move from being an online retailer into a brick-and-mortar food retailer. Operating in this new business is likely to pose many new challenges that Amazon is not particularly competent at addressing.
    It could be that these challenges are overcome. Or it could be that Whole Food’s founder John Mackey was right when he said a few years ago that the grocery market would be Amazon’s Waterloo.

    Read more: http://www.cnn.com/2017/06/17/opinions/amazons-waterloo-spicer/index.html

    Still clicking: The improbable survival of the indulgence watch business | Simon Garfield

    0

    The Long Read: In an increasingly digital macrocosm, beings are still willing to spend huge amounts on analogue timepieces. The inquiry is, why?

    On 17 March 2016, the watch manufacturer Breitling opened a lavish new stalling at Baselworld, the worlds biggest watch carnival, to show off its recent wonders. There was the Avenger Hurricane, a brawny pitch-black and yellow extravaganza in a special polymer casemade specifically to survive all extremes of superhuman adventure( 6,500 ). There was the Superocean Chronograph M2 000 Blacksteel, with full functionality at a magnitude of 2,000 metres( 3,850 ). And there were at least 60 other pieces, each out-glistening the other in an attempt to demonstrate a brand-new and costly road to tell the time.

    And then there were the fish. Above the acces to the temporary browse which, at 10 metres high, was really more of a pavilion was a big container supporting 650 jellyfish. The container certainly more of an aquarium was the size of a new London Routemaster bus sliced down the middle.Empty, it weighed 12 tonnes; its 16,113 litres of ocean included another 16.5 tonnes. Because it contained so many fish and so much water, the cisterns slopes were made from a 13 cm-thick mantle of methacrylate, a transparent information similar to plexiglass.

    Precisely what the jellyfish had to do with selling watches was a whodunit, and it would remain a riddle until they were removed from the container when the pavillion closed. Perhaps they represented impunity; perhaps they were a remember of the sort of happening you could see if you purchased a Breitling diving chronometer. But the strangest event about the cistern was that most people who find it precisely gazed up and swiftly moved closer. Considering where it was, it didnt seem extraordinary at all.

    For eight days each year, Basel becomes the centre of the watch world. The fairs organisers claimed 150,000 compensating visitors and 1,800 labels spread over 141,000 sq. metres of exhibit cavity. Admission expenditure 60 Swiss francs a daylight( nearly 50 ), for which one could have bought a neat Timex. Near the Breitling pavilion was an obelisk for Omega, and a palace for Rolex. TAG Heuer adorned its booth with a TAG Heuer-sponsored Formula 1 racing car. One could spend many hours sauntering the plush carpets here, and encounter many very handsome men and womenpromoting Breguet, Hublot, and Longines, and very many handsome men and women buying their wares, too. Some booths were also selling jewellery including Chanel, Gucci and Chopard and some labels were selling watches covered in jewels: symphonies of the unnecessary, such as the Harry Winston Premier Moon Phase 36 mm, with mother of bead and 104 brilliant-cut diamonds.

    The show was a occasion of our mastery of timekeeping, and of the elaboration and years of training that get into representing objectives of attractivenes and accuracy. But it was also a observance of excess and superfluousness, of watches that exist simply because they can, like animal acts at a circus. Numerous worked on “the worlds largest” intricate heights to act operates almost beyond usefulness: there used to be watches with a docket that lasts 1,000 times; there were watches establishing the phase of the moon in another experience zone. And then there were parts such as the Aeternitas Mega 4 from Franck Muller, made from 1,483 components. This would announce the hours and quarter-hours with the same gong sequence as Big Ben. At its opening, it was portended by its makes as the more complex wristwatch ever made, and a grandiose work of art.In addition to its 36 complications a complication is basically a neat subterfuge was the ability to tell the time. Another complication is because it rate 2.2 m.

    And therein lies the mystery of the modern timepiece. These dates , no one requires a Swiss watch to tell the time or a watch from any country. The occasion exposed on our mobile phones and other digital inventions will always be more accurate than the time exposed on even the most skilfully engineered mechanical watch, hitherto the industry has a visual proximity in our lives like few others. The storefronts of “the worlds” big-money streets glow with the lustre of Rolex and Omega; newspapers and magazines appear to be kept in business predominantly by watch adverts; airfields would be empty shells without them. The export quality of the Swiss watch trade fell by 3.3% last year, due primarily to a downfall in demand from the eastern Asia. But it is up 62.9% compared with six years ago. In 2015 the world bought 28.1 m Swiss watches valued at 21.5 billion Swiss francs.

    We live in uncertain financial ages, but watch costs at Baselworld picture no signals of making a cut-price concession to the unstable yen or rouble, or even the most recent rival from the Apple Watch. Surely, the opposite seems to be true: the higher the asking price, the greater the plea, for cheapness may suggest a decrease in quality.

    So the Rolex Oyster Perpetual Day-Date 40 in platinum( The watch par excellence of influential parties) is on sale for 41,700, while the platinum Patek Philippe Split-Seconds Chronograph with the alligator leash( For men who take accuracy seriously) is 162,970. For some collectors, this would be considered entry-level: the most complicated limited-edition watches sell for 1m or more. These watches have a waiting list, as “the worlds” merely contains so many squinting lord craftsmen who can prepare them, and even they havent received a lane to extend the day beyond 24 hours.

    But why do we continue to buy these over-engineered and redundant machines? Why do so many beings pay so much better for the purposes of an part whose principal role may be bought for so little? And how does the watch industry not only survive in the digital age, but survive well enough to make a 16,000 -litre saltwater shrine to its continued supremacy of an obsolete art? Far beyond the reveal of occasion, watches tell us something about ourselves. And so the answers to these questions lie within our inclination for extreme fiction, our consumption of stupefying marketing, our unbridled and impudent ability for fanfare, and our restored reverence for artistry in a digital world.

    And perhaps there is something else clicking away at us a be thought that the speeding up of our daily lives may soon testify devastating. When watchmaking began, we had no theory of packed calendars and unbreakable deadlines, much less of quality period or me period. Our epoches were not ruled by the clock. These daylights, having wreaked this ungovernable blizzard of rush upon ourselves, we may be grateful for anything not least a beautiful windable timepiece that reinstates at the least an illusion of control.


    The Patek Philippe showroom at 18 New Bond Street has been done up in a sophisticated palette of sycamore, brass and alabaster. Here we may find the revered Swiss companys entire current Patek collection, stretching from the relatively modest Calatrava and Aquanaut simulates( beginning at around 5,000) to the incongruous Grandmaster Chime Ref 6300 in grey amber, fatty as a fist, which expenditure in the boundaries of 1.7 m.

    One enters the shop through a double-door airlock, guarantee that no one goes in who may not appreciate delicate creativity, and no one buds who has not settled their detail. The showroom at 400 square metres, the largest single-brand watch outlet in the UK was not sufficiently large to host its own opening defendant in December 2014. The event was held in a glass pavilion in the courtyard of Somerset House, embellished for the night in a mode that would not have gazed out of place in the heyday of Versailles, albeit a Versailles lit by LED illuminations on fake cherry trees.

    The London salon is the most modern of Pateks three flagship supermarkets, but they all share a similar retail psychology. The others, in Paris and at the companys home in Geneva, envelop the clientele in an indistinguishable citrus fragrance, and in all three, the piped music is as suave and alluring as 1950 s Monaco. There are a few subtle differences, the companys PR chief tells me. In London you get biscuits with your coffee, whereas in Geneva you get chocolates.

    In all three accumulations an imminent acquire is become more pleasurable, and most likely, following the arrival of champagne. The London outlet has a lower-ground domain resembling a library, and a glint, gently well-lighted celestial area where prospective customers may inspect watches with eventual discretion. The entire showroom has purposely expelled all elements of the digital macrocosm: “there wasnt” iPads or electronic tills, and the staff have experienced a track in calligraphy to enable the careful inking of client receipts and guarantees.

    My expertise is reaching parties joyous and to create an environment my customers experience, responded Ed Butland, the accumulates chairman. We will show you any part suited to your needs and environment. Money is the latest concept we want to talk about. On the day I called, Butland was not wearing his usual watch, a manually wound platinum Calatrava with a two-tone dial, but imparting a wear-test on a stainless-steel ultra-thin push porthole Nautilus that had just been serviced.

    An iPhone has no soul, he enunciated. With most electronic inventions theres precisely a screen and a back, and nothing that connects you with whats actually going on to make it handiwork, and goods-for-nothing moving. Theres no human element and no human emotional connection. This partly interprets the longstanding petition of a mechanical timepiece of any make.A few weeks before my tour of the showroom, I had visited Patek Philippes headquarters in the Geneva suburb of Plan-les-Ouates, where I talked to Thierry Stern, the companys chairman. He had his own thinkings on why the watch endures.

    We should never forget that its roughly the only jewellery we can have as a gentleman, he remarked. And its something neat! We should never forget that. Its is not simply a watch, its a piece of art. If they[ our purchasers] want to keep it as something of value, fine. I would prefer to see them wearing it. Its also a honor I recollect. Yes, you could grant a quartz or digital watch to your son for his bridal, but I do not conceive those types of items today will last-place. They will change each year, like telephones, so should I etch a[ digital] watch like this and answer Joyous Birthday from your daddy, and then what are you going to do the next year?

    Patek Philippe prides itself on being the last independently owned watchmaker in Geneva. The corporation has been in the mitts of the Stern family since 1932. Thierry Stern, who is 46, took over from “his fathers” Philippe six years ago. He is gently unassuming and comfortably portly, and fairly lacking in the hauteur one may expect from the heads of state of such a distinctive brand.He address gently and chortles easily one has no trouble portrait him selling ties, or with a toilet of fondue in front of him. He recalled a congregating he had recently in New York with industry rulers from Silicon Valley, and he was surprised to see how many of them wore Patek. When he asked them why, he told me, They all said the same: It accompanies us down to earth, and its nice to have something mechanical when youve been working in the digital macrocosm for so long.

    In the last six years Stern has increased annual production from about 40,000 watches to 60,000, which is still a minuscule output compared to a Swiss monster like Rolex, which produces more than 700,000 watches a year. Exclusivity is a key to usefulnes. Stern maintained that he was not worried by a difficult start to the year and potential impacts of Brexit on sales; he had just approved the designs for the collecting for 2028. When youre dealing here experience, he showed, it makes it possible to take the long view.

    Patek Philippe, which sold its first watch in the 1850 s, has never been at the vulgar death of the market, and doesnt look for endorsements from stellar footballers and rappers the room other firebrands do. Jay Z, for example, “whos had” rapped about owning a Hublot and the big-face Rolex( I got two of those! he boasts in a duo with Kanye West on their book Watch the Throne) might not seem the most likely customer of the more subtle Patek brand. But he is: “hes been” recognized at basketball games wearing a 120,000 Grand Complications model in white amber. Perhaps he likes the gentility and( relative) imprisonment of it, a 21 st-century billionaire yearn for an updated 19 th-century masterpiece. Either lane, he is certainly an ardent buyer of the firebrands bright marketing.

    Patek has guided practically the same advert for the last 20 times, and it contains a tagline that is both enduringly effective and highly annoying: You never actually own a Patek Philippe. You simply look after it for the next generation. The row is accompanied by images of examples in the different stages of self-satisfaction: a father-god sat at a piano with his son, a mom chortling with her daughter over lifes little luxuries. The photo, taken by Herb Ritts, Ellen von Unwerth, Mary Ellen Mark and other artists whose wreak hangs in museums, are available to conjure a sense of responsibility and family obligation, of empire and heritage. They may plea primarily to someone with new money aspiring to be someone with old money. Buy an expensive watch, they seem to be suggesting, and you will belong.

    the
    The Aeternitas Mega 4 from Franck Muller. Picture: www.thewatchquote.com/ mesIMG/ imgStd/ 28276

    Tim Delaney, the chairman of Leagas Delaney, the English advertise company responsible for the Generations campaign, told me that the adverts arose out of a desire to reflect Patek Philippes own sense of longevity and belonging the fact that, unlike most watch brands, which are owned by large-scale corporations, the company is independent.

    I asked him why his campaign had lasted so long. I think its a universal penetration, he remarks. Its not pushy the thought doesnt running around, it doesnt become less intelligent the more you see it. The photographs are an attempt to show human beings and warmth. Truth Its idealised. Everyone knows its advertise. You have a strong sense that its a natural bail between the two people, the father-god and the son, father and daughter, so its appetizing, but its not a photograph of a person with his real son. I questioned Delaney whether there were any other watch expeditions he admired, and he conceived for less than a second before he enunciated No.


    In the last century we have knew the violate of the sound barrier, the invention of the atomic clock, radio-controlled timekeeping, the internet, and pixelated clocks pulsing inexorably on our information technology and telephones. And yet none of these developments has peril the dominance of the Swiss watchmaking industry. Exports flew even during world war ii with the rest of Europe in turmoil, the temporal reliability of neutral Switzerland assumed even greater meaning. For illustration, the International Watch Company a major manufacturer based on the banks of the Rhine, in the northern Swiss city of Schaffhausen sold its Big-hearted Pilots Watch to both the RAF and the Luftwaffe. Both backs were grateful for its massive dial, its huge glove-operable treetop and its protection against abrupt declines in air pressure as they tried to shoot one another out of the sky.

    In 2014, the Swiss exported 29 m watches. This was alone 1.7% of all watches bought globally, but 58% of their evaluate. This parent a fibre of questions. Why Switzerland in the first place? How did this unassuming, landlocked country be coming home with dominate service industries? And how did it employer the artistry of accusing tens of thousands for the purposes of an object that often kept hour less accurately than an object expenditure 10?

    The firstly mechanical watches were not Swiss. The earliest first round and then oval-shaped, and worn as large-scale necklaces seemed around 1510 in Germany, the Netherlands, France and Italy. A small swap developed in Geneva a few decades later, thanks mainly to artisans applied as goldsmiths; filigree and enamel job, and suffer with intricate engraving tools, permitted craftsmen to shift their attention to miniature auto-mechanics. There were 176 goldsmiths working in Geneva in the 16 th century, and their emergent watchmaking knowledge were almost certainly aided by the reaching of Huguenot refugees from France.

    None of this quite is one reason why it was Switzerland, rather than Germany or France, that gained the pre-eminent honour for accuracy and beauty. But this is because that reputation emerged mainly in the 20 th century. Prior to this, business such as Breguet, Cartier and Lip in Paris, and numerous small firmsbased in Glasshtte, in the German district of Saxony, all produced prized samples.( These neighborhoods still make fine watches, they just struggle to compete with the cachet of being established in Switzerland .)

    In England, which could justifiably claim to be the innovative regional centres for clock and watchmaking in the 17 th and 18 th centuries, the roster of experts of premier craftsmen included appoints still celebrated at the Greenwich Royal Observatory and the British Museum: Thomas Mudge, John Harrison and Thomas Tompion. With the exception of Harrison, whose clocks allowed the calculation of longitude at sea, the appoints are now all but forgotten, owing to the habitual British rule of forgetting its deep concern in which it formerly preceded the world.

    But the Swiss only maintained on moving, sometimes buying up its most important conglomerates elsewhere in Europe, and modelling craft the organizations and certification targets that increased the industrys reputation for character and franknes. In the 19 th century, the Swiss became lords of the increasingly flat mechanisms that allowed conventional pocket watches to evolve into wristwatches; a watch worn as a bracelet was particularly useful when going on horseback.

    The Swiss also made full usage of new innovations, enthusiastically superseding the old-time technique of gale a watch by key in favour of the modern stem-and-crown device. In the early 20 th century, they mixed the new American-originated system of conveyor-belt mechanisation with the most significant methods of local hand-crafting.

    Today, the particular tones that make a watch Swiss are the subject of strict legal explanation, and are as closely regulated as champagne or parmesan cheese( the specific characteristics on watches is always Swiss saw or precisely Swiss rather than Constituted in Switzerland, a tradition dating back to 1890 ). To prepare, a watch are required to comply with certain strict criteria( or, in agreement with the Fdration de lIndustrie Horlogre Suisse FH, where this clas originates, a watch must adhere to The reporting requirement stipulated by Swissness ). To categorize as Swiss Made, a watch must a) have a Swiss change( that is, the basic mechanism consisting of cogs and outpourings that realise the watch ticking) b) have such movements incorporated in a case that is moved within Switzerland and c) be checked and certified in Switzerland.

    All was going well until the 1970 s, when something smacked the hand-made mechanical watch craft like a mallet. As the decade developed it seemed that the Swiss has not been able to, after all, be telling the worlds epoch for ever. In September 1975, The Horological Journal a well regarded sell publishing founded in 1858 announced an important milestone in its own history of horology. On its cover was a picture of a Timex, a watch that extended on quartz. It contained a tiny segment of crystal that reverberated at a high and attached frequency when powered by a battery. This steady signal was then transmitted to an oscillator, an electronic route that regulated the gears that transformed the watch hands. The old-fashioned mechanism of gale and capability storage in a coiled springtime was dismissed at a stroke.

    The quartz change had been around since the 1920 s, but its miniaturisation had only been achieved in prototype by Seiko and Casio in Japan in the late 1960 s. Its price had previously taken it beyond the general consumer, but now, through mass production at Timex and its prime American challenger Bulova, the electronic watch represented a change of ideology a piece of disruptive technology long before the word existed. It was solid state, with no ticking, and the brand-new watch presaged the sunup of mass tech-based consumerism. Split-second timing, formerly the exclusive domain of physicists and technicians, was now available to all, and there was no better symbol of the seismic alter from the mechanical to the electronic world. Time itself was now twinkling at us everywhere. No theatre visit was complete without half-hourly beeping from watches in the audience, horrifies were now hastening us to every appointment.

    The Swiss reacted to the digital disturbance with a mix of self-denial and mild terror. Between 1970 and 1983, the Swiss share of the watch grocery fell from 50% to 15%, and service industries shed more than half its workforce. As one of Tom Stoppards personas introduced it in his 1982 performance The Real Thing, It gazed all over for the 15 -jewel movement. Men ranged through the marketplace wailing the cog is dead! But the working day of the Japanese digital watch were numbered. In the early 1980 s, with destiny on the horizon, the Swiss push back with a brand-new doctrine of their own, and something plastic, cheaper and powered by quartz and battery: the Swatch.

    The Swatch from its appoint onwards introduced colour, young people and recreation into Swiss watches( God knows, the fusty manufacture requires it ). The watches were sold in the companys own shops and advertised on MTV, while creators and film directors, including Keith Haring and Akira Kurosawa, designed limited editions and acquired watches hip and desirable again for a new generation. With the anxiety over, the Swiss could once more is focused on numbering their bank accounts. In 2014, gross sales of the Swatch watch amounted to more than 9bn Swiss francs. Today, the Swatch Group is the worlds largest watchmaking firm, consisting of firebrands including Longines, Blancpain and Rado that once would have shuddered at the believed to be being owned by an empire with such garish foundations. Swatch even owns Breguet, the company that claims to have stimulated the first wristwatch in 1810.


    Earlier this year, in an interview with the New York Times, Brad Pitt echoed his time on the mount of world war two movie Fury. Pitt, who is a brand diplomat for TAG Heuer, is recalled that Logan Lerman, a very young performer in the throw, was given a watch to keep track of various activities during the films recitals. One daylight he came to me and said the watch has ceased to, and I articulated, Youve just got to wind it. He came back literally 15 minutes later and responded, Wait, how do you wind it?

    For those born into the digital age, the prospect of making a watch start may seem as distant and implausible as crank-starting a car or changing the ribbon on a typewriter. But this is exactly this process the end of a stunt of infinitely intricate human engineering that requests to the watch connoisseur. It also explains why a fine watch expenses so much.

    Making anything really small by hand tends to be extremely expensive. In the watch industry, the precision of the tiny portions is one conclude for the great cost( even the tiniest fucking expenditures eight Swiss francs, precisely because it is such a tiny fucking ). But the major contributory factors are human and old-fashioned the prudence, handed down through centuries, required to make something beautiful and functioning from an otherwise inanimate assemblage of metal and stones. In each of the beautiful Grande Complication watches made by the International Watch Company( IWC) there are 659 segments 453 more than there are bones in the human body.

    But this is nothing in comparison with the Patek Philippe Grandmaster Chime, which holds 1,366 divisions within a 16.1 mm-thick event. This is the one with the 1.7 m price tag, and I handled one for a brief hour when I inspected the Geneva headquarters( how hour operates when youre enjoying something you are familiar with will soon be taken away from you ). The watch did actually detect expensive. It had a dual-face, a dominance device loping at 25,200 semi-oscillations per hour, a eternal calendar, a strikework isolator parade, a moon phase, and a Grande and Petite Sonnerie( internal chimes and consternations with minuscule hammers striking shiny bells when activated by a back lever to give the wearer know the time in the dark ).

    It was as heavy as any wrist would bear, and was without question a masterpiece of horological artwork. But the thing I liked most about it was that after nine years on the drawing board, and as many at vehicle manufacturers workbench, you still had to wind the damn beautiful event by hand.

    The greatest think of all is that this watch has a mechanical move, much of it accommodated from pocket watches created in the 17 th century. The precision tooling and some of the fitting may be to be undertaken by machine now, but the design and final forum the tiny clamps, outpourings, dishes, rotates and pearls, the loads on the edge of the balance wheel, the ratchets that intercede the power supply, the interconnected barrels that create an intensity reservation, and the pallet fork attached to the escapement wheel that causes the ticking din are to be undertaken by intelligence and hand.

    A master watchmaker at IWC Schaffhausen named Christian Bresser once told him that making a watch attained him seem omnipotent. Its the worst happen to add, but its the God complex, or the Frankenstein complex. You have the white-hot overcoat, and youre making life.

    The
    The Patek Philippe Grandmaster Chime. Photograph: Jean-Daniel Meyer/ Patek Philippe/ JD Meyer

    Creating life from pinions and pivots and tiny bolts may be the easy-going portion. One then has to sell the thing. With so many watch corporations creating merely slight discrepancies of the same commodity, how should the well-heeled customer make a option in thiscrowded sell? Should we rely, as we increasingly do in our contemporary world, on steering from fames?

    At Baselworld in 2015 I squeezed my channel into a opening of a brand-new watch at a pavilion designed for Hublot. A flashy beginner on the situation, Hublot was set up by an Italian in 1980, based itself in Nyon, a city in south-western Switzerland, and was owned by the French indulgence goods corporation LVMH. Hublot prides itself on its timekeeping for contributing boasting happenings, and its most recent firebrand envoy was Jos Mourinho, administrator of Manchester United and a keen watch collector.

    Brand representatives are a key element of watch salesmanship, and the fact that they do not generally wear a watch at all while achieving their greatest stunts is not a important consideration. Lionel Messi and Cristiano Ronaldo have signed for Audemars Piguet and Jacob& Co. Alongside Mourinho, Hublot also has Usain Bolt. Breitling has John Travolta and David Beckham, Montblanc Hugh Jackman, Rolex Roger Federer, IWC Ewan McGregor, and Longines Kate Winslet. Patek Philippe has shied away from luminary endorsements, but it did once boast that its clients included Queen Victoria.

    When Mourinho appeared at Baselworld in 2015 he was still director of Chelsea. He was wearing a grey raincoat over gray cashmere, and he accepted his watch with light applause and a short communication about how he has been part of the Hublot family for a long time as a fan, but now it had all been made official( ie he had received his bank transportation ). His watch was “ve called the” King Power Special One, nearly the size of a hockey puck, 18 -carat king gold with blue carbon, a self-winding Unico manufacture Flyback Chronograph with 300 ingredients, an immense 48 mm suit, all the mechanics uncovered on the dial line-up, blue-blooded alligator fasten, a skeleton dial, a supremacy reserve of 72 hours, an copy of 100 and a price in the boundaries of 32,000. The promotional blurb claimed that the item most like Mourinho himself: The watch is provocative the robust exterior obscures the genius below. It was both startling and gruesome at the same time.

    But the most remarkable happen about the Hublot King Power was not that it looked like an armoured container, but that it did not deter very accurate era. When the favourite American magazine WatchTime imparted research on an earlier pattern, it found it gained between 1.6 to 4.3 seconds a day. Additional epoch: yet another thing for Mourinho to feud with the referee.

    But accurate timekeeping has long ago ceased to be the quality. And this, with deep irony, is another reason why the world watch manufacture survives. Once you can afford to invest even entry-level prices for a Patek Philippe or a Hublot, your watch has begun to represent status and one-upmanship. A watch is a statement of achievement, and too of intent.( It is also one of the easiest ways to export fund from one country to another .) Something glittery on your wrist says something about your earning supremacy and your preference, much as an expensive car can do; it is not always an attractive peculiarity. Its a hallucination, of course, but the fatter and more complicated and expensive the watch, the more the wearer may presuppose limit of the universe, the still centre of a spinning wheel.

    Baselworld 2017 has already announced itself as a fairground for the appreciations. Next March, the see will peculiarity an expanding array of smart watches, pieces that intimate the leading brands are not ready to accept another debacle comparable to the quartz crisis. Many corporations initially rejected the potential impact of the Apple Watch and similar designs that act as a synced companion to the mobile phone, but they have been forced to reconsider; when Apple began offering a watch in a amber instance for several thousand pounds more than the standard representation, and Herms embarked acquiring 1,550 fastens for it, the luxury market began to feel a little uneasy.

    So Breitling will be offering its Exospace B5 5, allowed to be chronograph to be involved in any smartphone. And TAG Heuer will have its Connected Smart Watch, promising audio stream over WiFi and all manner of fitness tracking. It claims it commemorates a completely new period the worlds first wrist-worn computer.

    But the watch has always been a computer; certain differences now is what it estimates. A dial that once etched out our lives in hours and times, its accuracy dependent on our capacity to determine it in motion and jazz it, may now keep us connected with the rest of the earth, via GPS and overnight wireless accusing. Yet the striking occasion is not the rise of texts and emails on the wrists that was always going to come at some point but how robust the conventional and mechanical wristwatch has proven itself alongside the new technologies. Alongside the absurd complications of the fattest new timepiece develops something we are evidently keen to hang on to a faith that charm and refinement are ends in themselves, and that the workbench of the skilled operator is still adored more than the production line. A beautiful clicking timepiece causes us something back ferrying us, perhaps, to an imagined time when time was still our friend.

    Timekeepers: How the World Became Obsessed With Time, by Simon Garfield, is published by Canongate at 16.99. To guild a emulate for 13.93, go to bookshop.theguardian.com or call 0330 333 6846.

    Follow the Long Read on Twitter at @gdnlongread, or sign up to the long read weekly email here.

    Rob& Chyna: the saddest substantiate on TV

    0

    The format of this dreadfully dull show is identical to others of the Kardashian empire: interminable incidents of parties sitting in kitchens not gobbling cheese plates

    Is there a less qualified world reveal stellar than Rob Kardashian? If you lined up 10 parties from the casting record of A& Es Intervention and Rob Kardashian and had to choose one to base an ongoing television series around, would you ever pick him unless you knew his last name? Isnt this a tragedy? Shouldnt we all be more disturbed?

    Sunday nights premiere of the brand-new E! succession Rob& Chyna labels the render of the black sheep Kardashian to the public eye. Hes expended years of their own lives unwilling to leave his room, which caused him to gain( his texts) a grip of heavines. He searches less comfy shaping see linked with other human beings than the little orphan girl Newt from the movie Aliens. A Los Angeles Dodgers hat covers whats left of the poorest of the poor guys thin, unkempt mane. His wardrobe consists of T-shirts , nondescript jeans and sneakers. In other statements, when I watch this astoundingly depressing planned, I realise myself and what I might become( minus the millions of dollars ).

    The first few minutes of Rob& Chyna intend to obligate us sympathize with Rob and his pregnant fiancee Blac Chyna. As an aside, isnt it a bit ghoulish that Blac Chyna croaks almost exclusively by the figure Chyna in the first escapade now that the original Chyna the former WWE wrestler has died? Its like ransacking through someones jewelry after a funeral.

    Regardless of what you call her, Blac Chyna is the actual whiz of this reveal, even if her name is second on the pavilion. She came up from the world-famous strip golf-clubs of Atlanta and became something of an entrepreneur, at least in the way that we characterize that term in 2016. She took the Kardashian template of monetizing tabloid infamy through a sect of personality social media ubiquity, labelled commodities, and now, the final patch of the perplex, an E! actuality franchise. Shes become a major supporting player in the ongoing Kardashian meta-narrative having a baby with the rapper Tyga, who then leaves her for Kylie Jenner, which leads to Chyna join powers with Rob. Whether or not her relationship with Rob is genuine or a calculated effort to increase her paying potential is not for me to decide (* cough its bullshit cough *) but what is is whether or not this TV show is good. Its not.

    Rob
    Rob& Chyna: travelled with high winds. Image: E!

    If your litmus test for persisting with a program is answering the question does someone fart within the first 10 instants with a yes, then Rob& Chyna is for you. Spoiler alert, Chyna farts in the car. If “youd prefer” a bit of drama, then maybe flip over to another channel. Or hurl your cable carton or streaming invention into the nearest open body of water and walk into the town square. Either one is fine with me.

    The format of this painfully dull show is identical to the other outposts of the Kardashian empire: interminable vistums of parties driving luxury autoes on featureless roads, be standing kitchens not ingesting cheese dishes, or folding clothes for a business tour that may or may not ever happen. During these stages, mush-mouthed pod beings debate some ill-defined conflict. Someone needs to go to rehab for a vague trouble. Someone needs to text person back about a happen that happened off camera. Person suffers disrespected. A party invite is lost in the mail. Watching these demoes is like speaking the most banal email thread at 3am. Plug sad-eyed agoraphobe Rob Kardashian into this format and you have a antidote for insomnia so potent, the Food and Drug Administration should regulate it.

    The ostensible scheme of this chapter revolves around Rob alleging Chyna of texting guys behind his back. He proclaims this to be the case because he discovers that Chyna has changed the passcode on her iPhone. He even insinuates that shes fastening up with her ex, Tyga. All of this takes target with Rob spread out comfortably on a plot. Chyna disavows any evil, then accuses Rob of contacting women behind her back. He apparently declares it, which I vaguely recollect before my eyelids glued shut for the night. It must be the case, because the very next vistum is Chyna in another expensive gondola screaming at Rob to stop texting bitches.

    These are the moments one watches reality Tv for belligerence, incoherent holler and curse. This is why I favor the Andy Cohen Bravo model for reality over the clumsy Ryan Seacrest/ Kris Jenner indulgence gabfests. Contrast Rob& Chyna with Bravos Below Deck, currently on its fourth season and with one spinoff under its loop. Below Decks premise is simple: employ a knot of attractive deckhands on a mega-yacht, cater them with booze, and be fostered to melt down every escapade. Would you rather watch that or a prove starring people too far-famed to see proper chumps of themselves for your delight? The explanation is, neither, Im a grownup who is too busy including ethic to the culture to demoralize myself with such frivolities, but dont fret, I picked the show about yachties drunkenly hooking up too.

    I will say that the producers of Rob& Chyna( which include the titular Rob and Chyna among their grades) do try to spice things up. Scott Disick appears in the role of Robs only friend in around the world and his chauffeur, schlepping him around Los Angeles like a pasty white-hot Morgan Freeman from Driving Miss Daisy. Theres a memorable situation where Rob walks into Chynas home in full Eeyore mode, carrying buds to apologize for texting bitches. Chyna isnt having it, grabs the flowers, grubs them in a puddle, then knocks Rob out of her residence. This is the turning point of the suspect tale, as the rest of the episode concerns Chyna trying to get Rob to text her back, as she has apparently be pointed out that she bellowed at him to leave her alone while pee-pee all over his romantic gesticulate. Im sure Rob Kardashian, AKA Calabasas Morrissey, certainly took that well.

    Finally, Kris Jenner, matriarch of the extended Kardashian family and former nemesis of Blac Chyna, appears to counsel Chyna on how to handle Rob. Jenner is shown to be so shrewd that I half expected her to have grown a beard, picked up a large rod, and shed on a pointy hat off-screen. Much has been made of how Blac Chyna is so shrewd and took down the Kardashians by getting engaged to Rob. Thats a neat little underdog narrative, but if you think that Kris Jenner isnt inventive enough to use this to her advantage and will be the eventual win of this dim-witted rivalry, then you arent paying attention to the display. Thats fine, since it probably became you pass out from wearines, but the facts of the case remains that one of the last faces you see in this first chapter is Kris Jenner. The whole absurd project is hers and hers alone. Chyna can have a piece, as long as she offer her taxes to her feudal lord.

    And they are Rob. At last, they found a style to monetize his mopey face and wrinkled invests. Instead of a Shrek-like animal they obstruct locked away in a cellar, he has his own demo, which merely furthers the attainment of the objectives of his family. In exchange, this boy who probably has real clinical depression has to pretend to be a Tv stellar. By collision, E! has stumbled upon the saddest establish on television, so fitted with existential hopelessnes that youd presume it was drummed up by a government-funded novelist in some sodden Scandinavian country over a bottle of cheap scotch. If “youre watching” more than one of the following options occurrences, youll probably find yourself not leaving the house for years, just like Rob Kardashian.

    Parties Envisage This Likenes Demo A Car Crash Victim’s Soul Leaving His Person

    0
    What happens after we croak? Any minds ?

    For those who don’t believe in life after death, this image was able to be the proof you need to change your opinion. A blurry image of a grey-headed happening that could has become a feeling leaving the body of someone who was injured inaroadaccident. I’m sold.

    The photo in question was taken by truck driver Saul Vazquez in Kentuckyon Tuesday evening, and thousands of parties are claiming itshows the moment a man’s soul left his figure. It could also be a scratching on the lens, Photoshop or a ruse of the light.

    The image has travelled viral since Vazquez posted the likenes to Facebook, and it has been sharedthousandsof meters by people who really believe it shows the existence of a feeling and not someone’s mediocre Photoshop skills.

    Posting the epitome online, he wrote:’ Zoom in and pay attention to the shadow only off the top of the state trooper hat. All I say is I hope everyone involved is okay.’

    An unnamed motorcyclist was severely injured in the clang, and later died in infirmary as a result of their injuries.So, this could suggest that his soul isn’t depicted in this photo- as he didn’t die until he arrived at research hospitals. Or his soul only backed out early.

    Convinced ?

    Lost with amnesia: How do you get home? – BBC News

    0
    Image copyright West Mercia Police
    Image caption “Roger” was wearing a black hooded top, pitch-black jogging fannies, grey-headed and black socks and lace up trainers.

    When someone is lost, with no storage of who they are or how they got there, how do they get home?

    It’s a question still awaiting an answer in the case of an elderly serviceman procured strolling an English metropoli in November.

    The tall, slim, grey-haired man said his figure was Roger Curry, but he could not remember anything else about himself.

    After further research, police now suppose Roger Curry may have been a now-deceased sidekick of the man.

    More on this and other tales from Herefordshire

    The man with memory loss, who for now West Mercia Police are announcing “Roger”, depicts signalings of dementia, doctors say.

    He was located wandering in the Credenhill area of Hereford on 7 November by passers-by who took him to Hereford County Hospital.

    “People with no memory are often taken to hospital to see if there is a physical or mental issue which requires medicine, ” remarked Louise Vesely-Shore, from the UK Missing Persons Bureau.

    “They could have been in a vehicle crash and have a psyche harm or suffer from dementia.

    “Treatment can sometimes help them to recollect patches of information which can help identify them.”

    For those searching for a lost loved one, neighbourhood infirmaries can offer a port of call.

    Image copyright PA
    Image caption Mobile telephones view essential evidences to a person’s identity

    Police look for evidences the lost person may have on them – mobile phone contacts are an easy way to marks family and friends. But attire descriptions and tattoos also yield essential leads.

    There were no such cursors in Roger’s case, replied Adam Vanner, matter of missing persons co-ordinator at West Mercia Police.

    “We checked CCTV in the region where Roger was found to see if we could retrace his steps.

    “We contacted rest home, care agencies, local authorities and neighbouring police forces.

    “We loped his fingerprints through our database and put out a national broadcast to every force to see if he matched with any of their missing people.

    “This all happened in the first few hours.

    “Roger does not add much but speaks with either an American or Canadian accent, so we contacted both embassies.

    “We apprise the Missing Beings Bureau and our corporate communications put out an appeal through the local media.”

    All these directions have so far have all contributed to dead ends.

    Ms Vesely-Shore said the Missing Persons Bureau had a DNA database, but it required authorization from the lost party or their guardian – which was problematic in amnesia cases.

    “The police have specialist detectives to interrogation vulnerable people, ” she said.

    “And it can take some time for those with memory loss to build up connections with police or those looking after them.”

    She said the bureau only saw “a handful” of people in Roger’s situation per year, as most be defined “quite quickly”.

    This was the case involving a soldier who woke up on a park bench in Birmingham unable to remember anything about himself.

    He strolled to Digbeth police station on New Year’s Day 2013 and was taken to Birmingham City Hospital where harbours called him “Steve”.

    Police secreted his photograph to the media and eight weeks later he was reunited with their own families who showed his appoint was Robert .

    Image caption Robert, who woke up on a park terrace in Birmingham, told you he vaguely remembered having a sister and had recognised the Wolverhampton Wanderers button on tv

    A “mystery man” found in a Peterborough ballpark with a “severe case of amnesia” was appointed as 22 -year-old Alvydas Kanaporis, from Lithuania.

    Mr Kanaporis was found in the early hours of 18 May 2014 and taken into the care of Cambridgeshire and Peterborough NHS Trust( CPFT ).

    He spoke with an Eastern European accent and his details were circulated in an international media appeal two months later.

    A man claiming to be two brothers contacted approvals.

    Image copyright CPFT
    Image caption Alvydas Kanaporis could not recollect any details of their own lives including his mention, age or where he was from

    A man discovered walking wall street of Sheerness, Kent, in a soaking wet dres and tie in April 2005 became known as “Piano Man” .

    Image copyright Medway Maritime Hospital
    Image caption The identity of so-called Piano Man baffled authorities for 4 months

    He did not speak, so staff at the Medway Maritime Hospital rendered him a pen and paper and he drew detailed photographs of a grand piano.

    Image copyright PA
    Image caption “Piano Man” did not speak for four months but sucked photographs of forte-pianoes

    When staff showed him the forte-piano in the hospital’s chapel, he had allegedly handed a classical performance.

    Piano Man break-dance his stillnes in August saying he was German. The embassy was contacted and he was reunited with his father.

    The mystery man was named as Andreas Grassl, 20, from Prosdorf, Bavaria.

    Image copyright Mike Gunnill
    Image caption Andreas Grassl’s lawyer said his client( visualized) was unwell, and had not forged amnesia

    A man was reunited with his father after spotting him on the BBC’s Missing Live programme – five years after he thought he was cremated.

    John Renehan’s father John Delaney went missing in 2000 and when a decomposed mas matching his description was may be in 2003 he was identified by a coroner.

    But it emerged that Mr Delaney, 71, of Oldham, Greater Manchester had been put in a maintenance home after being saw walking around the town with memory loss.

    Image caption Greater Manchester Police acknowledged “mistakes were made” in the discovery process that led to John Delaney’s family belief he was dead

    In each of these cases, crucial clues about the person’s identity were self-evident from the individual themselves.

    Local authorities, hospitals, police and the Missing Persons Bureau pulled together to share these evidences in a bid to reunite the lost person with their loved ones.

    Mr Vanner belief the public is the police’s strongest tool in identifying people who do not know who they are themselves.

    He told: “We have had positive bulletin from our first press is calling for information to help identify Roger.

    “Someone contacted us and said they believe they recognised the man.

    “They said they believed he had served in the Army in Hereford and the name he had given was that of a acquaintance who had died.

    “We managed to get in touch with the ex-commanding officer and “were just” the process of checking their records of all the ex-servicemen back to World War Two.

    “Unfortunately the identify the member of the public gave us is not a pair. But we will continue to explore that avenue.”

    He insisted anyone who believed they knew Roger’s genuine identity to get in touch.

    Mandy Appleby, Herefordshire Council’s head of safeguarding, announced: “If we can identify who Roger is and better understand his background, we can ensure he’s receiving the right care to meet his needs.”

    Feminism, politics and death: my mum died the night Hillary Clinton lost

    0

    They may seem like unrelated events but the end of Clintons campaign and my mothers life made me reflect differently on my own political career

    My mother died the night Hillary Clinton lost. These might seem like two very unrelated events and youd be right about that. But for me, and my somewhat particular circumstances, Ive found a plethora of meaning about life and death, feminism and politics.

    See, it was also the night I was due to be sworn in as a councillor for my local city council. It was my first political foray and Ive reflected on the start of my own political journey while on the other side of the world a smart and skilled female politician saw the end of hers, with our whole gender brutalised by a despicable Trump. And though Mum doesnt know it, all my political guts I got from her.

    Mum was diagnosed with breast cancer 10 days before the 2016 Australian federal election. Dad called me from Canberra to say he had taken Mum to hospital and she had acute pneumonia. I was going through the processes of my Labor nomination for council elections. With days to the federal election, every spare moment I wasnt working I was door-knocking and pre-polling.

    I dont remember that first conversation with Dad. I do remember the call the next day when Dad told me Mum had terminal cancer (as well as acute pneumonia) and the cancer had spread through her ribs, spine and pelvis. I was at my desk so I booked a flight home and, as I headed out the door, asked a colleague to cancel me out of every election activity I was signed up for.

    Breast cancer is a disease that inflicts itself predominantly on women. Its also one of the most misdiagnosed cancers around. Mum had her last mammogram only months earlier and it hadnt appeared. I grew bitter quickly.

    At the same time this was a federal election where it was one bloke versus another bloke versus another bloke, and women barely seemed to get a mention. I had volunteered the bulk of my time on campaigns to support female candidates in tough Victorian seats, none who won. I sat bedside my mother who taught me everything and watched women largely erased out of public life.

    On Sunday 3 July, a day after the federal election Mum was only in the second week of a disastrous five week stint in hospital my journal shows compassion draining out of me:

    I suspect I will grow rough and battle hardened and unforgiving from this. A part of me hopes I will. Perhaps I will grow ruthless and mean and brutal like life and that might make me powerful like men. I dont think Mum will like the new me. Ill have an excuse to be mean now, finally.

    I thought at length about quitting the council race. We didnt know the timeline Mums cancer was working to, although wed been told up to 24 months for stage four breast cancer. I was enjoying caring for her and all her needs. But quality of life for Mum was also about quality of life for her daughters and, honestly, I just always thought shed make it a little longer.

    So I ran my council campaign in between working full time and flying back home to care for Mum, alternating every second weekend with my sister. Offering a parallel world to my campaigning life, my life with Mum gave me such relief. I loved the quiet nights I shared with her. From the carers bed in her room, I would lie facing her and would listen for her breathing as her lungs drew in air from her oxygen tank.

    In late October, I won the third and final spot at the council ward elections; Mum went back into hospital and I flew home again.

    While nothing can prepare you for the death of a parent I did everything I could to prepare myself. I read memoir and non-fiction (by women) and I talked with women who had experience, both personal and professional.

    In the final days, as Mum slept sedated, I read A Very Easy Death by Simone de Beauvoir. It was the 50th anniversary of the translation of the French feminists account of her mothers death. The months of that death also mirrored my mothers own: a few long weeks over October and November.

    De Beauvoirs mothers death was frightening to me because it was everything her maman didnt want. She wasnt ready for death and her medical wishes were not respected: the doctors operated on her even though she had begged de Beauvoir that she wouldnt let them touch her body. Her final moments were full of pain and distress. De Beauvoir wasnt even there as she had slept through the panicked phone calls from her sister.

    I was not watching the US election results that afternoon and evening in November. Mum was at Canberras public hospice set amongst beautiful gardens and overlooking Lake Burley Griffin. For the last few days she had been heavily sedated. Mums breathing changed late in the afternoon and we knew, not long now.

    In academia, philosopher Michel Foucault called it a heterotopia, but most of us might think of it as a bit of a headfuck, a space or place in time that has more meaning or relationship to another space than it might first appear. As my mum lay dying, I was in a room full of strong women with her. My cousin brought in the bad news from the US and I slumped in my chair beside Mum, overwhelmed by yet more insurmountable grief. I thought if I was back in Melbourne, if my mum wasnt dying, Id be at my council ceremony right now and Hillary might even have been winning but here I was in this awful parallel universe that happened to be real.

    Mum died that night. A little after midnight, I woke from a light doze and Mum was turned slightly in her bed, facing me and she had stopped breathing. I leaned in close and checked for a pulse on her wrist. Her skin was so perfectly warm. The family all woke and we said our goodbyes.

    I stayed with Mums body till morning. I picked out clothes for her as the nurses cleaned and dressed her. Then finally watched on as they are you ready for this? put Mums body into the transport bag. I followed the nurses as they pushed her bed down the hallway to the cold room, where I thanked them and having already said my goodbyes, left for my car and for my first day without my mum in a bleak, bleak new world.

    In the months after, it was through the company of women, and particularly women who have lost their mothers, that I have found my feet again. I havent turned bitter and mean as I once thought or hoped I would. My feminism is softer with new compassion but also bolder with new militancy.

    Im still finding my political feet, but Ive been elected to a council with majority women membership plus we have a female mayor and CEO too. At every council meeting I reflect deeply on the values, learnt from my mother, that drive my decision-making even if at times they wont make me popular.

    I dont see much of Hillary in the news these days, which Im thankful for. It reminds me of Mum each time and when I do, bystanders watch me dab at my eyes and think she must really have liked Hillary. Little do they know that was the night my mum died.

    Read more: https://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2017/jun/18/feminism-politics-and-death-my-mum-died-the-night-hillary-clinton-lost

    You Will Not Conceive This Driver Lived This INSANE Freak Accident — Identify The Pic& Hear Her Story!

    0

    Talk about breathtaking luck — bad AND good!

    On Friday, Florida resident Christina Kay Theisen was driving home from a business excursion when the unthinkable happened — a barge oar crashed through her windshield and roughly killed her.

    Theisen was driving through an neighbourhood dubbed “alligator alley” for the reptiles which are often met hanging in he waterways beside the road. We suspect boat oars are more dangerous than crocs these days!

    As for how the craft oar lodged itself in the driver’s windshield, the treacherous item somehow happened loose from a travel RV on the freeway. It’s also possible the RV kicked the oar up from the asphalt.

    Related: Firefighter Responds To The Fatal Car Crash Of His Own Son

    Luckily for Christina, she was able to think rapidly and evades the object:

    “When it came at me, the first reaction was to duck to the right. And that probably saved my life.”

    Phew, what a succour! We can’t suppose how scary developments in the situation must have been for Theisen!

    According to highway patrol, the terrifying case has been closed. It’s uncertain if the operator of the RV was penalty for not properly fastening the oar.

    Shockingly, according to Florida law, even if pieces descending from your vehicle disable or to be killed on the road, the crime is only a misdemeanor with a penalty of up to 60 daytimes in prisons and a $500 penalty. Eesh!

    Stay safe out there, Christina!

    [ Image via Florida Highway Patrol .]

    Protests follow Philando Castile shooting verdict

    0

    St. Paul, Minnesota (CNN)Protests large and small were mounted Friday night after a jury found a police officer not guilty in the fatal shooting of motorist Philando Castile.

    A crowd gathered outside the Minnesota state Capitol and later marched through the streets. The St. Paul Police Department estimated 2,000 people participated.
    Speakers led chants, sang hymns and urged the protesters not to lose hope.
      The protests were expected. After officer Jeronimo Yanez fatally shot Castile during a traffic stop on July 6, 2016, demonstrations took place across the nation, partly because the aftermath of the shooting was live-streamed on Facebook by Castile’s girlfriend, a passenger in the car.
      Organizers of the Friday protest said on Facebook, “This verdict shows how the system is rigged against justice for victims of police terror.”
      One woman made her feelings known in a smaller, quieter way.
      Theresa St. Aoro brought flowers Friday to the spot in Falcon Heights, outside Minneapolis, where Castile was shot.
      It’s been a roadside memorial since the day Castile died but it received extra visits Friday. Flowers piled up and a handwritten sign said, “I will miss you.” A more professionally made sign said, “Falcon Heights: The Nation Is Watching.”
      “I was stunned, just stunned,” St. Aoro said. “I don’t think that this was a fair jury. It took so long when they couldn’t decide. Did they just say, ‘Oh, it’s Friday and I want to go home?’ This was not justice at all.”
      St. Aoro said she believes the jury makeup was wrong from the trial’s outset.
      The jury was composed of eight men and four women, including one black man and one black woman. The jury heard two weeks of testimony and spent about 27 hours deliberating.
      “I don’t think this was a fair jury at all, made up of more than half middle-aged white people,” she said.
      Numerous groups castigated the decision. Sherrilyn Ifill, the director-counsel of the NAACP Legal Defense Fund, said the jury’s decision shows how difficult it is to prosecute a police officer in a fatal shooting.
      “This incident seemed so egregious and avoidable that we hoped that this time, it might be different — that this time, justice might be served,” Ifill said.
      “Because if the government can take your life and no one is held responsible, you are a second-class citizen, if not fully dehumanized in the eyes of the law,” she said. “That is the devastating message this verdict, along with all those similar acquittals before it, sends to communities of color across the nation.”
      The ACLU said in a statement: “Two Supreme Court decisions from the 1980s allow officers to use deadly force when a reasonable officer on the scene could reasonably fear for their safety. These two decisions create an atmosphere where police violence is sanctioned based on what we think a hypothetical officer could have felt, even if, in reality, the officer was acting recklessly, had ill motives or was acting based on implicit bias.
      “Taking another person’s life is the most extreme action a police officer can take, and consequently new standards are needed to better ensure that police killings happen rarely.”
      Mel Reeves, a community activist, told CNN outside the courthouse that Castile was killed by “the system.”
      “Yanez worked for the system. He killed somebody. Philando Castile got victimized by the system. So we need to start asking question about the system — why is the system violent?” Reeves said.

      Read more: http://www.cnn.com/2017/06/16/us/philando-castile-verdict-protests/index.html

      11 Luminary You Never Knew Spent Time In Jail

      0

      Another week, another celebrity going arrested.

      Abby Lee Miller, the wizard of Dance Moms, was justsentenced to one year and the working day in prison on Tuesday, May 9, for hoax. The convict comes about a year and a half after her indictment.

      According to TMZ, she hidaround $755,000 in earnings from the government. In addition to her convict, Miller willpay a combined $160,000 in fines a $40,000 fine and a $120,000 sentence for the currency-reporting abuse, according to Deadline.

      Getty Images

      A couple of weeks before Millers arrest, Bachelor sun Chris Soules was detained for supposedly fleeing a lethal hit-and-run. On Tuesday, April 25, Soules was formally charged with allegedly leaving the background of a fatal accident and was heldon $10,000 bond.

      Soules is kind of the last person I would expect to be arrested. Hes just not on my radar, but there are a lot of celebrities who have expended time in jail. Like, a lot

      Heres a directory of personalities you certainly forgot spent time in the slammer 😛 TAGEND

      1. Mark Wahlberg

      REX/ Shutterstock

      Wahlberg provided 45 days of a three-month sentence in jail when he was 16 for assaulting two Vietnamese humankinds while attempting to cheat a convenience store, according to the New York Daily News. He said he was high when it happened.

      According to the LA Times, Wahlbergasked for a pardon for the assaults back in 2014, but the request was dropped in 2016 after he failed to respond to a word asking if he wanted to keep it open.

      He supposedly told reporters at the Toronto Film Festival back in September 2016 that he was able to meet with the victims and apologize for the pain he caused.


      2. Robert Downey, Jr.

      Getty Images

      Before he ever stepped into his Iron Man suit, Robert Downey, Jr. had multiple stints in prison for pharmaceutical property between 1996 and 2001, according to the New York Daily News.

      He failed to show up to a court-ordered dose test in 1999, so he was sentenced to a three years in a substance abuse facility/ prison in California run by the state, according to Daily Mail. He was released by a evaluate after serving 12 months. But his addiction sustained after that.

      According to Daily Mail, its most recent bride, Susan Levin, inspiredhim to clean up his act. Before they got married in 2005, Levin( now Downey) cleared him get clean, and hes been clean ever since. He property Iron Man in 2008.


      3. Lil Kim

      Getty Images

      Just like Miller, Lil Kim was sentenced to one year and one day in prison back in 2005 for three counts of perjury and one detail of plot. She was released in 2006.


      4. Tim Allen

      Tim Allen was arrested in 1978 at the Kalamazoo/ Battle Creek International Airport in Michigan for wealth of cocaine. He alleged guilty to drug trafficking and spent two years and four months in prison in Minnesota.

      In an interview with Washington Times, Allen did prison set him in a position of enormous humility. He mentioned, I was able to make amends to friends and family and refocus “peoples lives” on mounting and achieving goals.


      5. Jane Fonda

      Getty Images

      The Grace and Frankie star was arrested in 1970 in a Cleveland airport for drug smuggling, but the pills she had werent stimulants the latter are vitamins.

      Fonda was an ardent political activist during the course of its 70 s( and still is) and was openly against the Vietnam War. She was coming back from an anti-Vietnam War speaking gig in Canada when she was wrongfully arrested for the vitamins in her bag.

      In a 2009 blog post, she said she guesses she was arrested because the Nixon administration wanted to shut up her activism.According to Daily Mail, she said in the blog pole,

      I think they hoped this scandal would cause the college communications to be cancelled and spoil my respectability. I was handcuffed and put in the Cleveland Jail, which is when the mugshot was taken.

      I was secreted on attachment and a few months later, after every pill had been tested under a lab( with taxpayers money !) service charges were rejected and there were a few paragraphs hidden in the back of articles that they were vitamins , not drugs.

      Her mugshot has become an iconic persona ever since. She even sells merchandise featuring it and raises the merch onto red carpets.

      Her Grace and Frankie co-star Lily Tomlin recently broughtthe clutch with Fondas mugshot to the Grace and Frankie premiere. Iconic, truly.


      6. Lauryn Hill

      Getty Images

      Lauryn Hill was sentenced to 3 month in prison in 2013 because she reportedly didnt pay taxes on$ 1 million in income.

      She pled guilty to the charges in 2012, but she also observed she needed to be able to earn money in order to pay the taxes she owed, according to Billboard. Hill had left the music business times before, so she wasnt doing enough money be paid her debts.

      According to CNN, she provided the full three months in a facility in Connecticut and was released in October 2013.


      7. Martha Stewart

      Getty Images

      Martha Stewarts seizure was so shocking, its now famed. She was sentenced for insider trading and went to a federal women prison in Alderson, West Virginiain 2004.

      She provided five months in prison, five months ofhouse arrest, and two years of probation.In an interview withGiuliana Rancic in 2014, Stewart didnt sugarcoat the difficulties of prison, saying it can ruin you.

      But she also told the E! secure,

      Luckily, I have an extremely strong, healthy physique, so my health never stood. Health, confidence and that curiosity to realize what shouldnt happen, what you can overcome. So, I overcame a very difficult, nasty situation.


      8. Paris Hilton

      Getty Images

      Paris Hilton was convicted of contravening her probation and be subject to 45 days in prison back in 2007 without the option for furlough, toil handout, alternative incarcerate or electronic monitoring, according to Today.

      She had beenon probation for alcohol-related negligent driving. According to Public, she was liberated early for good behavior.

      She was also booked in 2016 for alleged cocaine belonging, but was liberated shortly after.


      9. Lindsay Lohan

      Getty Images

      Ohhhh, Lindsay. My daughter. Shes been arrested so many times over the past decades. But lucky her, shes go to leave jail early just about each time shes been in it.

      In November 2007, she literally onlyserved 84 hours of a 24 -hour sentence due to overcrowding at the Century Regional Detention Center in Lynwood, California, according to E! Online.

      On another occasion in 2010, Lindsay was supposed to serve 90 eras in the same prison, but she was released in 2 week because the prison was overcrowded again and she hadnt perpetrated a violent crime.

      Her convictions were a result of booze and drug-related offenses, as well flouting her probation by failing to attend court-mandated alcohol education classes.


      10. Matthew McConaughey

      REX/ Shutterstock

      Matthew McConaughey was reportedly arrestedfor marijuana possession, owned of narcotic paraphernalia and refusing transportation at 3 am on a Monday morning in October 1999 and was liberated on bond later that day.

      And, get this: When the policemen came to arrest him, he was allegedly dancing altogether naked and playing the bongos.

      In a 2016 interview with Playboy, McConaughey confirmed thats what he was doing when the policeman indicated up to his home believing him of marijuana possession. He spoke,

      Whats wrong with thumping on your containers in your birthday suit? I have no sadness about the channel I got there. But whats the lesson? Shut the window that has the beautiful fragrance of jasmine blowing in because its two in the morning and you might wake a neighbor.


      11. Michelle Rodriguez

      Getty Images

      The Fast and the Furious star was arrested and sentenced to six months in prison in 2007 for contravening her probation in a DUI case.

      She only had to serve 18 of her 180 days in prison due to overcrowding, just like Lindsay Lohan.

      When asked about her time in prison in an interview with The Guardian, she alleged,

      Im soooo glad to be over my 20 s, soul. Boy, were they wild In my 20 s, I employed the excuse of adolescence to have huge amount of spontaneous enjoyable. Ive scaped responsibility for the last 10 times , now its time to get on it Very, extremely, naughty. I was a bad girl. Im good now.

      There ya have it. Lots of fames go to jail.