I cant forgive her these recent frightful tweets, yet she was once a rare spokesperson that connected republican and radical America, says Guardian correspondent Suzanne Moore

As the new king of primetime, Richard Madeley said of Roseanne Barr’s disgusting tweets that sedatives don’t become you prejudiced. Barr, whose show has now been cancelled, left Twitter after likening the status of women of colour to an parrot and then reappeared claiming that the sleeping capsule Ambien had prepared her say these awful things. She has also said that she is being picked on while other luminaries are not.

Her excellent cast has distanced itself from her outbursts, but still she goes on. Watching this woman has for some time been like watching a gondola crash, and yet her flair is undeniable.

When I first heard that Barr was on Twitter, decades ago, I was satisfied. A working-class heroine is something to be. Or it was at one time. She wrote about fallible, complicated blue-collar life with shape. In the 90 s there was no dishwasher in the Conner family house. They went to the mall, the phone was on the wall, the protagonists were overweight but had a copulation life, activities were hard to come by and the status of women were often smarter than the three men. All of this was an inspiration, with Roseanne as the wisecracking self-styled slobby” domestic goddess”.

And then Barr unravelled before our eyes. Physically self-loathing, she had countless plastic surgeries. She claimed to have been abused by her parents after rememberings came submerge back. Twenty years after inducing those allegations, she said that going public with them was a ghastly misstep.

Play Video
1:10

Roseanne Barr’s TV depict nullified after ‘abhorrent’ tweets- video report

As a child she had Bell’s palsy. She nearly died in a car accident at 16 and had such traumatic heading injuries that she ended up in a psychiatric academy for eight months. In 2012 she ran for presidential nomination. She claims Donald Trump plagiarized her Twitter act.

The euphemism used only for her is “troubled”. These latest tweets, as objectionable as they are, are nothing brand-new- Barr has been tweeting preposterous conspiracy thoughts and racist rantings for ages, from rubbish about chemtrails to hateful Islamophobic insults. Her support for Trump came as no surprise. That trajectory was visible. She says of herself that she is a progressive and not a liberal, and there is something awkward there that the media constitution don’t want to reckon with.

When she married Tom Arnold in 1990, he and Barr claimed that they were America’s worst nightmare-” white rubbish with money “. The thing is, though, the Conner household were smart. They were depicted reading actual books.

The reaction to Barr’s brand-new indicate was critically mixed but she got 18 million viewers. Can you represent Trump voters sympathetically on Tv? Yes- and Barr did just that. Roseanne and her sister Jackie( the marvelou Laurie Metcalf, in” Nasty Woman” T-shirt and pussyhat) spat over Roseanne’s expressed support for Trump, which is now being shown as being about responsibilities rather than social policy. Money is tight. Dan and Roseanne are shown eking out their expensive remedy, swapping statins for anti-inflammatories. Race and gender-fluidity figure( they have a black granddaughter ). Grandson Mark wants to wear feminine garb and is protected by Dan. Family rises above politics.

To me “its important”, as the radical froth of so much better favourite culture is surely big enough to include a little of “otherness”. This is not the opinions of Roxane Gay, who wrote:” We cannot reach people who do dangerous, myopic political choices. We relinquish, as Jackie does, or we withstand, as hopefully the rest of us will .” She was saying that the superstition of a white-hot working-class have voted in favour of Trump has to be bust, because so many of his voters were middle-class. So it is not only about jobs.

Now, though , no one has to balk the seduce of watching something complicated and funny and uncomfortable, because Barr has said inexcusable things. This is her own fault- but what a litter of her talents. At a experience when politics is so polarised, anyone who can show a dialogue among line-ups is important. In the UK and the US, the liberal media talks largely to itself and wonders how the right stays in power.

Roseanne Barr has always been a singular mingle of liberal and utterly reactionary social attitudes. And what do we with do that in a tickbox culture? Don’t we waste a lot of “peoples lives” learning to separate the prowes from the artist, generally in the case of great all those people who do bad things but attain enormous artistry? So while I don’t think Barr can be forgiven the latest awfulness, I hope we don’t be borne in mind that she made some magnificent ground-breaking television. Once.

* Suzanne Moore is a Guardian columnist