Company substantiates its technology failed to stop collision on same day US traffic safety watchdog opens investigation into crash

A Tesla vehicle was driving in “autopilot” mode where reference is disintegrated into a stopped firetruck in Utah, the company said in a report to police that frequently cast blamed on the driver , not its semi-autonomous driving system.

The confirmation that the vehicle’s technology failed to prevent it from colliding with a stopped object in its track came the same day that the US National Highway Traffic Safety Administration( NHTSA) announced it was sending a team to investigate the 11 May crash in Utah.

Tesla officials told police on Wednesday that the motorist, who suffered a broken ankle when her Tesla Model S crashed, had turned on the “autosteer” and “cruise control” boasts about 80 seconds before the clang and taken her hands off the rotation, Tesla officials told police on Wednesday.

In recent weeks, Elon Musk’s electric car company has faced fresh scrutiny over the safety of its autopilot facet, which is supposed to assist drivers in navigating the road but cannot drive the cars on its own. In response to innumerable high-profile autopilot crashes, including a fatal collision in California, the CEO has insisted that his technology is safer than traditional gondolas. Yet some experts have warned that the semi-autonomous facets demonstrate drivers a false sense of security, allowing them to become easily distracted.

The 28 -year-old Utah operator was looking at her phone before the collision and was given a traffic citation for” failure to keep proper lookout”, police said Wednesday.

Tesla’s report to police said there were more than a dozen the case of an the driver taking her hands off the rotate for more than one minute at a time and that she only re-engaged when she was provided visual alarms.

” Drivers are frequently advised Autopilot aspects do not establish Tesla vehicle’ autonomous’ and that the operator perfectly must remain vigilant with their attentions on the road, hands on the rotation and they must be prepared to take any and all action necessary to avoid hazards on the road ,” the company wrote.

The Tesla Model S is understood after it stumbled the back of a firetruck in South Jordan, Utah. Photograph: Handout/ Reuters

The car was traveling at 60 miles per hour when the gate-crash happened, Tesla said, adding that the move manually pressed the vehicle brake fractions of a second before the collision. The driver’s use of autopilot was ” contrary to proper use”, Tesla said, because she” did not pay attention to the road at all days” and used the peculiarity on a street with no core median and with intersections to be covered by stoplights.

Asked why the autopilot technology did not prevent the collision, a spokesperson told the Guardian in an email:” Tesla told police that the accident resulted because the motorist did not pay attention to the road at all era, and that Autopilot is not intended for use without a fully attentive driver .”

The spokesperson likewise pointed to Tesla’s manual, which tells its drivers that the cruise control aspect cannot detect all objects and may not brake or slow down for stationary vehicles and that its” automated emergency braking” is not a substitute for drivers maintaining a safe interval from the cars in front of them.

Tesla also declined to comment on the NHTSA investigation. In recent weeks, the company has publicly feuded with US sleuths over sustaining federal inquiries be attributed to autopilot.

Musk too criticized correspondents for writing about the disintegrate in a series of tweets earlier this week.

The first lethal autopilot clang had taken place in 2016 when Tesla’s software failed to “see” the white side of a tractor-trailer in its track against the background of a lily-white sky.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here