Driver of Model S, which failed to stop at a red light and collided with a firetruck in Utah, told examiners she was using the semi-autonomous system

The driver of a Tesla vehicle that failed to stop at a red light and collided with a firetruck told examiners that private vehicles was controlling on “autopilot” mode when it disintegrated, police said.

A Tesla Model S was traveling at 60 mph where reference is crashed with emergency situations vehicle in South Jordan, Utah, on Friday, generating minor injuries to both drivers, officials said Monday. The Tesla driver’s claim that the car was employing the autopilot technology has raised fresh questions about the electric car company’s semi-autonomous arrangement, which is supposed to assist moves in navigating the road.

The precise case of the accident, which left the operator with a shattered ankle, remains unknown, with Tesla saying it did not yet have the car’s data and could not comment on whether autopilot was involved. South Jordan police also said the 28 -year-old driver” admitted that she was looking at her telephone prior to the collision” and that witnesses said the car did not damper or take any action to avoid the crash.

” As a reminder for drivers of semi-autonomous vehicles, it is the driver’s responsibility to stay alert, drive safely, and be in control of private vehicles at all times ,” the police department said in a statement.

The
The stage of the crash in Utah. Photograph: Politenes of the South Jordan police department

While driverless technology is expected to constitute the roads significantly safer by reducing human error and crashes, companies like Tesla are currently in a transition period that some experts say has created unique dangers. That’s because semi-autonomous facets, investigate has shown, can lull operators into a untrue sense of security and make it hard for them to remain alert and occur as needed.

Tesla has faced reaction for its decision to brand these new technologies” autopilot“, given that the drivers are expected not to depend on the peculiarity to keep them safe.

After a Tesla autopilot crash in March resulted in the driver’s death, the company issued a series of lengthy statements blaming the victim for” not paying attention “.

On Monday, Tesla’s CEO Elon Musk complained about an article on the Utah crash, writing on Twitter:” It’s super messed up that a Tesla crash ensue in a separated ankle is front sheet report and the~ 40,000 people who died in US auto accidents alone in past year get almost no coverage .”

He also wrote that it was ” actually astounding” the collision at 60 mph simply resulted in a broken ankle:” An impact at that rapidity usually results in severe injury or death .”

Musk has on numerous occasions powerfully chastised journalists investigating Tesla crashes, arguing that the unflattering news coverage was dissuading people from employing these new technologies and thus” killing people” in the process. After Tesla recently labeled an award-winning bulletin shop an” militant company”, some commentators compared the company’s hyperbolic denouncements of the press to the anti-media strategy of Donald Trump.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here